Quadro T2000 Mobile vs M5000M
Aggregated performance score
T2000 Mobile outperforms M5000M by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 285 | 247 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 7.52 | 4.68 |
| Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2018) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | GM204 | N19P-Q3 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 (8 years old) | 27 May 2019 (4 years old) |
| Current price | $468 | $2221 |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
M5000M has 61% better value for money than T2000 Mobile.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1,536 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 962 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1051 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,200 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 93.60 | 114.2 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on Quadro M5000M and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | no data |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | no data |
| Mosaic | + | no data |
| nView Display Management | + | no data |
| Optimus | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 7.5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
T2000 Mobile outperforms M5000M by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
T2000 Mobile outperforms M5000M by 15% in Passmark.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
T2000 Mobile outperforms M5000M by 14% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 84
−13.1%
| 95−100
+13.1%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
−17.9%
|
30−35
+17.9%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
−13.5%
|
40−45
+13.5%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35
−16.1%
|
35−40
+16.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
−15%
|
65−70
+15%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 45−50
−17.4%
|
50−55
+17.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
−17.9%
|
30−35
+17.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
−14.9%
|
50−55
+14.9%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
−12.2%
|
55−60
+12.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
−14.5%
|
70−75
+14.5%
|
| Hitman 3 | 50−55
−17.6%
|
60−65
+17.6%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 35−40
−15.8%
|
40−45
+15.8%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33
−13.3%
|
30−35
+13.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 35−40
−15.8%
|
40−45
+15.8%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−17.6%
|
40−45
+17.6%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
−13.5%
|
40−45
+13.5%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35
−16.1%
|
35−40
+16.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
−15%
|
65−70
+15%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 45−50
−17.4%
|
50−55
+17.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
−17.9%
|
30−35
+17.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
−14.9%
|
50−55
+14.9%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
−12.2%
|
55−60
+12.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
−14.5%
|
70−75
+14.5%
|
| Hitman 3 | 50−55
−17.6%
|
60−65
+17.6%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 35−40
−15.8%
|
40−45
+15.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 27−30
−17.9%
|
30−35
+17.9%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33
−13.3%
|
30−35
+13.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 35−40
−15.8%
|
40−45
+15.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 67
+48.9%
|
45−50
−48.9%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−17.6%
|
40−45
+17.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
−13.5%
|
40−45
+13.5%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35
−16.1%
|
35−40
+16.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
−15%
|
65−70
+15%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
−17.9%
|
30−35
+17.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
−14.9%
|
50−55
+14.9%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
−12.2%
|
55−60
+12.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
−14.5%
|
70−75
+14.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 38
−18.4%
|
45−50
+18.4%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−17.6%
|
40−45
+17.6%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
−14.8%
|
30−35
+14.8%
|
| Hitman 3 | 27−30
−17.9%
|
30−35
+17.9%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 24−27
−12.5%
|
27−30
+12.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
−17.6%
|
20−22
+17.6%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
−15.4%
|
14−16
+15.4%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
−17.4%
|
27−30
+17.4%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 18−20
−15.8%
|
21−24
+15.8%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
−18.8%
|
18−20
+18.8%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
−17.9%
|
45−50
+17.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−16.7%
|
35−40
+16.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−35
−17.6%
|
40−45
+17.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−16.7%
|
40−45
+16.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−21.1%
|
21−24
+21.1%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 12−14
−25%
|
14−16
+25%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
−15.4%
|
14−16
+15.4%
|
| Hitman 3 | 16−18
−11.8%
|
18−20
+11.8%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−8.3%
|
12−14
+8.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
−10%
|
10−12
+10%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−12
−27.3%
|
14−16
+27.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−16.7%
|
21−24
+16.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−12
−18.2%
|
12−14
+18.2%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 9−10
−22.2%
|
10−12
+22.2%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−20%
|
24−27
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−21.4%
|
16−18
+21.4%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 16−18
−17.6%
|
20−22
+17.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−16%
|
27−30
+16%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
This is how M5000M and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:
- T2000 Mobile is 13.1% faster than M5000M in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the M5000M is 48.9% faster than the T2000 Mobile.
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 33.3% faster than the M5000M.
All in all, in popular games:
- M5000M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
- T2000 Mobile is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 17.88 | 20.62 |
| Recency | 2 October 2015 | 27 May 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 60 Watt |
The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M5000M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
