NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs GeForce GT 630M

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

General info

Comparison of Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 630M architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
 
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GM204
 
GF117
Type
Mobile workstation
 
Laptop
Release date
18 August 2015
 
22 March 2012

Technical specs

Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 630M quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 630M performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Pipelines
1,280
 
96
CUDA cores
n/d
 
96 cores
Core clock speed
975 MHz
 
Up to 800 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
 
n/d
Transistor count
5,200 million
 
585 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
 
33 Watt
Texture fill rate
78
 
Up to 12.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
 
307.2 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 630M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
medium sized
Bus support
n/d
 
PCI Express 2.0
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
n/d

Memory specs

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 630M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
2 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
Up to 128bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
 
3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
 
Up to 32.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 630M.
HDMI
-
 
+
HDCP
-
 
+
Maximum VGA resolution
n/d
 
Up to 2048x1536
Display Port
1.2
 
n/d

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 630M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
3D Blu-Ray
-
 
+
3D Vision
-
 
+
Optimus
-
 
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
-
 
+
3D Vision Pro
+
 
n/d
Mosaic
+
 
n/d
nView Display Management
+
 
n/d
Optimus
+
 
n/d
CUDA
5.2
 
+
DirectX 11
n/d
 
DirectX 11
DirectCompute
n/d
 
+

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 630M, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12
 
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
DirectX 11.2
n/d
 
12 API
Shader Model
5.0
 
n/d
OpenGL
4.5
 
4.5
OpenCL
n/d
 
1.1

Video card benchmarks performance comparison

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 630M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
25.81 +650.3%
 
3.44 −650.3%
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
n/d
 
58812.00
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
49204.00 +782.3%
 
5577.00 −782.3%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6937.00 +929.2%
 
674.00 −929.2%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
7723.00 +974.1%
 
719.00 −974.1%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
10259.00 +891.2%
 
1035.00 −891.2%
3DMark Vantage Performance
n/d
 
4868.50
Unigine Heaven 3.0
n/d
 
10.00
Passmark
4365 +539.1%
 
683 −539.1%
Octane Render OctaneBench
53 +657.1%
 
7 −657.1%

Rendering quality tests

GFXBench render quality
4541 +0%
 
4541 +0%
GFXBench high precision render quality
4541 +0%
 
4541 +0%

Mining hashrate

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 630M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s +1095.2%
 
21 Mh/s −1095.2%

Game benchmarks comparison (in FPS)

Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 630M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS, while overall gaming performance is a number in 0-100 range, and the older the game, the less impact it has on the overall grade.
Overall gaming performance
22.22 +222100%
 
0.01 −222100%
Games benchmarked by notebookcheck.net
Far Cry Primal (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
15.00
Overwatch (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
39.60
medium / 768p
n/d
 
28.00
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
low / 768p
n/d
 
14.20
medium / 768p
90.00
 
n/d
high / 1080p
55.00
 
n/d
ultra / 1080p
48.00
 
n/d
4k / 2160p
20.00
 
n/d
Dota 2 (2015)
low / 720p
n/d
 
116.00
medium / 768p
n/d
 
73.00
high / 1080p
n/d
 
23.30
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
21.50
Fallout 4 (2015)
low / 720p
n/d
 
18.30
GTA V (2015)
low / 768p
n/d
 
52.30
medium / 768p
n/d
 
35.90
high / 1080p
n/d
 
8.40
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
low / 768p
n/d
 
30.00
medium / 768p
n/d
 
18.80
high / 1080p
n/d
 
9.90
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
6.90
The Witcher 3 (2015)
low / 768p
n/d
 
12.10
Far Cry 4 (2014)
low / 768p
n/d
 
22.20
medium / 768p
n/d
 
16.30
Battlefield 4 (2013)
low / 768p
n/d
 
32.50
medium / 768p
n/d
 
21.10
high / 768p
n/d
 
14.80
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
6.30
Crysis 3 (2013)
low / 768p
n/d
 
32.90
medium / 768p
n/d
 
17.75
high / 768p
n/d
 
11.70
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
4.45
X-Plane 10.25 (2013)
low / 768p
n/d
 
46.60
medium / 768p
n/d
 
15.50
high / 768p
n/d
 
6.90
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
4.50
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
low / 768p
n/d
 
139.20
medium / 768p
n/d
 
97.90
high / 768p
n/d
 
65.60
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
35.40
Diablo III (2012)
low / 768p
n/d
 
92.50
medium / 768p
n/d
 
66.25
high / 768p
n/d
 
46.00
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
23.00
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
low / 720p
n/d
 
43.00
medium / 768p
n/d
 
31.00
high / 768p
n/d
 
23.00
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
13.07
World of Warcraft (2005)
low / 600p
n/d
 
198.00
medium / 768p
n/d
 
155.00
high / 1024p
n/d
 
48.00

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

650.3% faster (about 7.5 times) in synthetic tests
222100% faster (about 2222 times) in games
Much newer (18 August 2015 vs 22 March 2012)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

More pipelines (96 vs 1)
Less power hungry (33 vs 100 watts)
Optimus Support
PureVideo HD VP4
3D Vision
3DTV Play
Bitstream HD Audio
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
DirectCompute
OpenCL (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
OpenGL 4.0
DirectX 11
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
HDMI
HDCP
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision / 3DTV Play

So, Quadro M4000M or GT 630M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 630M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 630M, ask them in Comments sections, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Like
Like

Choose a GPU

Compare GPUs

Comparisons

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M4000M or GeForce GT 630M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.