NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs GeForce GT 525M

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M

General info

Comparison of Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 525M architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Maxwell
 
Fermi
Code name
GM204
 
GF108
Type
Mobile workstation
 
Laptop
Release date
18 August 2015
 
5 January 2011

Technical specs

Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 525M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 525M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
1,280
 
96
CUDA cores
n/d
 
96
Core clock speed
975 MHz
 
600 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
 
n/d
Transistor count
5,200 million
 
585 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
 
23 Watt
Texture fill rate
78.00
 
9.6 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
 
230.4 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 525M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
medium sized
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
n/d

Memory specs

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 525M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
1 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
 
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
 
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 525M.
Display Connectors
No outputs
 
n/d
Display Port
1.2
 
n/d

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 525M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus
-
 
+
3D Vision Pro
+
 
n/d
Mosaic
+
 
n/d
nView Display Management
+
 
n/d
Optimus
+
 
n/d
CUDA
-
 
+
DirectX 11
n/d
 
DirectX 11

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 525M, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12
 
12 API
Shader Model
5.0
 
n/d
OpenGL
4.5
 
4.5
OpenCL
n/d
 
1.1
Vulkan
+
 
-

Video card benchmarks performance comparison

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 525M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
24.36 +763.8%
 
2.82 −763.8%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
49204
 
n/d
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6937
 
n/d
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
7723
 
n/d
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
10259 +1184%
 
799 −1184%
3DMark Vantage Performance
n/d
 
3840
Passmark
4567 +661.2%
 
600 −661.2%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
n/d
 
630
Octane Render OctaneBench
53 +783.3%
 
6 −783.3%

Rendering quality tests

GFXBench render quality
4541 +0%
 
4541 +0%
GFXBench high precision render quality
4541 +0%
 
4541 +0%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 525M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s +1573.3%
 
15 Mh/s −1573.3%

Game benchmarks comparison (in FPS)

Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 525M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS, while overall gaming performance is a number in 0-100 range, and the older the game, the less impact it has on the overall grade.
Overall gaming performance
0.43
 
n/d
Games benchmarked by notebookcheck.net
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
medium / 768p
90
 
n/d
high / 1080p
55
 
n/d
ultra / 1080p
48
 
n/d
4k / 2160p
20
 
n/d
StarCraft 2 (2010)
low / 768p
n/d
 
183
medium / 768p
n/d
 
42
high / 768p
n/d
 
30
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
17

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

763.8% faster (about 8.5 times) in synthetic tests
Much newer (18 August 2015 vs 5 January 2011)
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 28.8 GB/s)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 40 nm)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M

More pipelines (96 vs 1)
Less power hungry (23 vs 100 watts)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
DirectX 11
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)

So, Quadro M4000M or GT 525M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 525M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and GeForce GT 525M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
Like
Like

Choose a GPU

Compare GPUs

Comparisons

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M4000M or GeForce GT 525M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.