Radeon PRO V710 vs R9 M485X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M485X with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.

R9 M485X
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.17

PRO V710 outperforms R9 M485X by a whopping 259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking505179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.5914.72
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameAmethystNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483456
Core clock speed723 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54432.0
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs128216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB28 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s504.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 M485X 9.17
PRO V710 32.88
+259%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M485X 3660
PRO V710 13129
+259%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−240%
160−170
+240%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−233%
130−140
+233%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−240%
160−170
+240%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%
Fortnite 50−55
−252%
190−200
+252%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−233%
130−140
+233%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Valorant 85−90
−241%
300−310
+241%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−233%
130−140
+233%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−240%
160−170
+240%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−228%
450−500
+228%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Dota 2 65−70
−248%
230−240
+248%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%
Fortnite 50−55
−252%
190−200
+252%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−233%
130−140
+233%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−248%
80−85
+248%
Valorant 85−90
−241%
300−310
+241%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−233%
130−140
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Dota 2 65−70
−248%
230−240
+248%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−233%
130−140
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−248%
80−85
+248%
Valorant 85−90
−241%
300−310
+241%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−252%
190−200
+252%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−253%
240−250
+253%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−241%
150−160
+241%
Valorant 100−105
−250%
350−400
+250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Valorant 45−50
−248%
160−170
+248%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Dota 2 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.17 32.88
Recency 15 May 2016 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 158 Watt

PRO V710 has a 258.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 250% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 58.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M485X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M485X is a notebook card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Radeon R9 M485X
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M485X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M485X or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.