NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs GeForce 940MX

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

General info

Comparison of Quadro M4000M and GeForce 940MX architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
 
Maxwell
Code name
GM204
 
GM107
Type
Mobile workstation
 
Laptop
Release date
18 August 2015
 
28 June 2016

Technical specs

Quadro M4000M and GeForce 940MX quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Quadro M4000M and GeForce 940MX performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Pipelines
1,280
 
512
Core clock speed
975 MHz
 
795 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
 
861 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
 
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
 
23 Watt
Texture fill rate
78
 
27.55
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
 
881.7 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M4000M and GeForce 940MX compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
medium sized
Bus support
n/d
 
PCI Express 3.0
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
None

Memory specs

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and GeForce 940MX: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
2 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
 
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
 
40.1 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and GeForce 940MX.
Display Port
1.2
 
n/d

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and GeForce 940MX. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
GPU Boost
n/d
 
+
GameWorks
-
 
+
Optimus
-
 
+
GameWorks
-
 
+
3D Vision Pro
+
 
n/d
Mosaic
+
 
n/d
nView Display Management
+
 
n/d
Optimus
+
 
n/d
CUDA
5.2
 
+
GeForce Experience
n/d
 
+

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and GeForce 940MX, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12
 
DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
Shader Model
5.0
 
n/d
OpenGL
4.5
 
4.5

Video card benchmarks performance comparison

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and GeForce 940MX. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
25.81 +220.2%
 
8.06 −220.2%
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
n/d
 
140152.00
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
49204.00 +327.4%
 
11513.00 −327.4%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6937.00 +278.7%
 
1832.00 −278.7%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
7723.00 +289.9%
 
1981.00 −289.9%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
10259.00 +302.4%
 
2549.50 −302.4%
3DMark Vantage Performance
n/d
 
8549.00
Unigine Heaven 3.0
n/d
 
25.20
Passmark
4365 +241.5%
 
1278 −241.5%
Octane Render OctaneBench
53 +211.8%
 
17 −211.8%

Rendering quality tests

GFXBench render quality
4541 +0%
 
4541 +0%
GFXBench high precision render quality
4541 +0%
 
4541 +0%

Mining hashrate

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and GeForce 940MX. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s +146.1%
 
102 Mh/s −146.1%

Game benchmarks comparison (in FPS)

Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and GeForce 940MX are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS, while overall gaming performance is a number in 0-100 range, and the older the game, the less impact it has on the overall grade.
Overall gaming performance
22.22 +3167.6%
 
0.68 −3167.6%
Games benchmarked by notebookcheck.net
Ark Survival Evolved (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
26.40
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
7.30
high / 1080p
n/d
 
6.20
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
3.10
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
23.00
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
11.00
high / 1080p
n/d
 
10.00
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
8.00
Destiny 2 (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
30.15
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
15.50
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
30.60
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
11.90
high / 1080p
n/d
 
11.30
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
6.00
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
30.60
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
15.15
high / 1080p
n/d
 
9.80
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
8.60
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
44.90
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
15.20
high / 1080p
n/d
 
13.60
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
8.95
Resident Evil 7 (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
65.90
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
31.10
high / 1080p
n/d
 
17.45
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
5.70
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
47.50
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
15.60
high / 1080p
n/d
 
13.05
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
9.90
Battlefield 1 (BF1) (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
49.40
medium / 768p
n/d
 
30.30
high / 1080p
n/d
 
14.85
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
12.80
Civilization VI (2016)
low / 768p
n/d
 
52.10
medium / 768p
n/d
 
27.40
high / 1080p
n/d
 
13.80
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
10.50
4k / 2160p
n/d
 
10.10
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
24.00
medium / 768p
n/d
 
17.45
high / 1080p
n/d
 
9.45
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
4.90
Dishonored 2 (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
21.10
medium / 768p
n/d
 
20.35
high / 1080p
n/d
 
13.60
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
11.30
Doom (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
38.50
medium / 768p
n/d
 
30.50
high / 1080p
n/d
 
14.85
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
12.35
Far Cry Primal (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
32.00
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
14.00
high / 1080p
n/d
 
13.00
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
10.00
Overwatch (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
73.50
medium / 768p
n/d
 
51.40
high / 1080p
n/d
 
24.50
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
15.50
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
low / 768p
n/d
 
35.70
medium / 768p
90.00 +307.2%
 
22.10 −307.2%
high / 1080p
55.00 +318.3%
 
13.15 −318.3%
ultra / 1080p
48.00 +370.6%
 
10.20 −370.6%
4k / 2160p
20.00
 
n/d
The Division (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
40.20
medium / 768p
n/d
 
24.00
high / 1080p
n/d
 
11.25
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
10.40
Titanfall 2 (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
63.00
medium / 768p
n/d
 
44.30
high / 1080p
n/d
 
17.80
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
15.40
Watch Dogs 2 (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
32.60
medium / 768p
n/d
 
27.30
high / 1080p
n/d
 
12.50
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
8.50
XCOM 2 (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
31.30
medium / 1080p
n/d
 
11.40
high / 1080p
n/d
 
7.20
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
4.10
Dota 2 (2015)
low / 720p
n/d
 
101.00
medium / 768p
n/d
 
89.80
high / 1080p
n/d
 
48.40
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
46.35
Fallout 4 (2015)
low / 720p
n/d
 
35.95
medium / 768p
n/d
 
22.90
high / 1080p
n/d
 
12.30
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
10.20
GTA V (2015)
low / 768p
n/d
 
77.10
medium / 768p
n/d
 
68.55
high / 1080p
n/d
 
17.95
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
7.75
Just Cause 3 (2015)
low / 768p
n/d
 
41.15
medium / 768p
n/d
 
32.60
high / 1080p
n/d
 
15.95
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
16.10
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
low / 768p
n/d
 
81.05
medium / 768p
n/d
 
52.35
high / 1080p
n/d
 
25.45
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
21.70
The Witcher 3 (2015)
low / 768p
n/d
 
35.30
medium / 768p
n/d
 
22.31
high / 1080p
n/d
 
11.35
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
7.10
Far Cry 4 (2014)
low / 768p
n/d
 
44.20
medium / 768p
n/d
 
31.40
high / 1080p
n/d
 
14.20
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
13.30
Sims 4 (2014)
low / 768p
n/d
 
158.60
medium / 768p
n/d
 
68.70
high / 1080p
n/d
 
38.00
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
29.50
Battlefield 4 (2013)
low / 768p
n/d
 
67.40
medium / 768p
n/d
 
44.30
high / 768p
n/d
 
31.20
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
12.10
Crysis 3 (2013)
low / 768p
n/d
 
44.30
medium / 768p
n/d
 
26.30
high / 768p
n/d
 
20.10
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
6.95
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
low / 768p
n/d
 
182.00
medium / 768p
n/d
 
156.80
high / 768p
n/d
 
107.20
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
57.90
Diablo III (2012)
low / 768p
n/d
 
125.60
medium / 768p
n/d
 
86.60
high / 768p
n/d
 
75.10
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
46.15

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

220.2% faster (about 3 times) in synthetic tests
3167.6% faster (about 32.5 times) in games
Wider memory bus (256 vs 64 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 40.1 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

Somewhat newer (28 June 2016 vs 18 August 2015)
More pipelines (512 vs 1)
Less power hungry (23 vs 100 watts)
GPU Boost 2.0 (increases NVIDIA GPU voltage and frequency when there's a temperature headroom. Similar to AMD PowerTune)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
GeForce Experience (software suite built to manage NVIDIA GPU parameters, and to record and stream game video)
GameWorks

So, Quadro M4000M or 940MX?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 940MX is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and GeForce 940MX, ask them in Comments sections, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
Like
Like

Choose a GPU

Compare GPUs

Comparisons

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M4000M or GeForce 940MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.