NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs AMD FirePro M5950

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
AMD FirePro M5950

General info

Comparison of Quadro M4000M and FirePro M5950 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
 
TeraScale 2
Code name
GM204
 
Whistler
Type
Mobile workstation
 
Mobile workstation
Release date
18 August 2015
 
4 January 2011

Technical specs

Quadro M4000M and FirePro M5950 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Quadro M4000M and FirePro M5950 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Pipelines
1,280
 
480
Core clock speed
975 MHz
 
725 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
 
n/d
Transistor count
5,200 million
 
716 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
 
35 Watt
Texture fill rate
78
 
17.4
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
 
696.0 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M4000M and FirePro M5950 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
medium sized
Bus support
n/d
 
n/a
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
MXM-A (3.0)
Form factor
n/d
 
MXM-A
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
n/d

Memory specs

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and FirePro M5950: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
1 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
 
3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
 
57 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and FirePro M5950.
Display Port
1.2
 
n/d

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and FirePro M5950. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
3D Vision Pro
+
 
n/d
Mosaic
+
 
n/d
nView Display Management
+
 
n/d
Optimus
+
 
n/d
CUDA
5.2
 
-

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and FirePro M5950, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12
 
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Shader Model
5.0
 
n/d
OpenGL
4.5
 
n/d

Video card benchmarks performance comparison

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and FirePro M5950. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
25.81 +543.6%
 
4.01 −543.6%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
49204.00
 
n/d
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6937.00
 
n/d
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
7723.00
 
n/d
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
10259.00 +659.9%
 
1350.00 −659.9%
3DMark Vantage Performance
n/d
 
6257.00
Passmark
4365
 
n/d
Octane Render OctaneBench
53
 
n/d

Rendering quality tests

GFXBench render quality
4541 −0.1%
 
4546 +0.1%
GFXBench high precision render quality
4541 −0.1%
 
4546 +0.1%

Mining hashrate

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and FirePro M5950. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s +274.6%
 
67 Mh/s −274.6%

Game benchmarks comparison (in FPS)

Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and FirePro M5950 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS, while overall gaming performance is a number in 0-100 range, and the older the game, the less impact it has on the overall grade.
Overall gaming performance
22.22 +44340%
 
0.05 −44340%
Games benchmarked by notebookcheck.net
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
medium / 768p
90.00
 
n/d
high / 1080p
55.00
 
n/d
ultra / 1080p
48.00
 
n/d
4k / 2160p
20.00
 
n/d
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
medium / 768p
n/d
 
43.50
high / 768p
n/d
 
30.90
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
16.00

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

543.6% faster (about 6.5 times) in synthetic tests
44340% faster (about 444.5 times) in games
Much newer (18 August 2015 vs 4 January 2011)
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 57 GB/s)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 40 nm)

Advantages of AMD FirePro M5950

More pipelines (480 vs 1)
Less power hungry (35 vs 100 watts)
OpenCL 1.1
Type A MXM

So, Quadro M4000M or FirePro M5950?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and FirePro M5950, ask them in Comments sections, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
AMD FirePro M5950
Like
Like

Choose a GPU

Compare GPUs

Comparisons

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M4000M or FirePro M5950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.