NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs AMD FirePro M6000

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
AMD FirePro M6000

General info

Comparison of Quadro M4000M and FirePro M6000 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
 
GCN 1.0
Code name
GM204
 
Heathrow
Type
Mobile workstation
 
Mobile workstation
Release date
18 August 2015
 
1 July 2012

Technical specs

Quadro M4000M and FirePro M6000's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M4000M and FirePro M6000's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
1,280
 
640
Core clock speed
975 MHz
 
800 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
 
n/d
Transistor count
5,200 million
 
1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
 
43 Watt
Texture fill rate
78.00
 
32.00
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
 
1,024 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M4000M and FirePro M6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
medium sized
Bus support
n/d
 
n/a
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
MXM-B (3.0)
Form factor
n/d
 
MXM-B
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
None

Memory specs

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and FirePro M6000: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
2048 MB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
 
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
 
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and FirePro M6000.
Display Connectors
No outputs
 
No outputs
Display Port
1.2
 
n/d
StereoOutput3D
-
 
+

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and FirePro M6000. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
+
 
n/d
Mosaic
+
 
n/d
nView Display Management
+
 
n/d
Optimus
+
 
n/d

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and FirePro M6000, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12
 
12.0
Shader Model
5.0
 
n/d
OpenGL
4.5
 
4.5
Vulkan
+
 
-

Video card benchmarks performance comparison

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and FirePro M6000. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
24.91 +196.9%
 
8.39 −196.9%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
49204
 
n/d
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6937
 
n/d
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
7723
 
n/d
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
10259 +323.6%
 
2422 −323.6%
3DMark Vantage Performance
n/d
 
10744
Passmark
4567
 
n/d
Octane Render OctaneBench
53
 
n/d

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and FirePro M6000. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s
 
n/d

Game benchmarks comparison (in FPS)

Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and FirePro M6000 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS, while overall gaming performance is a number in 0-100 range, and the older the game, the less impact it has on the overall grade.
Overall gaming performance
0.43 +4200%
 
0.01 −4200%
Games benchmarked by notebookcheck.net
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
medium / 768p
90
 
n/d
high / 1080p
55
 
n/d
ultra / 1080p
48
 
n/d
4k / 2160p
20
 
n/d
Diablo III (2012)
low / 768p
n/d
 
172
medium / 768p
n/d
 
121
high / 768p
n/d
 
93
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
69
StarCraft 2 (2010)
low / 768p
n/d
 
152
medium / 768p
n/d
 
130
high / 768p
n/d
 
78
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
37
World of Warcraft (2005)
low / 600p
n/d
 
212
medium / 768p
n/d
 
203
high / 1024p
n/d
 
87

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

196.9% faster (about 3 times) in synthetic tests
4200% faster (about 43 times) in games
Much newer (18 August 2015 vs 1 July 2012)
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 72 GB/s)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

Advantages of AMD FirePro M6000

More pipelines (640 vs 1)
Less power hungry (43 vs 100 watts)
StereoOutput3D

So, Quadro M4000M or FirePro M6000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and FirePro M6000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
AMD FirePro M6000
Like
Like

Choose a GPU

Compare GPUs

Comparisons

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M4000M or FirePro M6000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.