NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Comparison of Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 20 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 20's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 20's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
67.2 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 20 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 20: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
160 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 20.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 20. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 20, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 20. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Pro Vega 20 32.69 +39.8%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Pro Vega 20 62318 +39.7%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Pro Vega 20 7287 +22%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Pro Vega 20 8979 +37.4%
Pro Vega 20 6290 +39.7%
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 20. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 20 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Less power hungry (75 vs 100 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
39.8% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (14 November 2018 vs 18 August 2015)
More pipelines (1280 vs 1)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
So, Quadro M3000M or Pro Vega 20?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 20, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.