NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs P620

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
NVIDIA Quadro P620

General info

Comparison of Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Value for money (0-100)
28.78
 
20.28
Architecture
Maxwell
 
Pascal
Code name
GM204
 
GP107
Type
Mobile workstation
 
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
 
27 May 2019
Price now
$160
 
$188

Technical specs

Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
1,024
 
512
Core clock speed
1050 MHz
 
1177 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
 
1442 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
 
3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
 
40 Watt
Texture fill rate
67.2 GTexel / s
 
43.33 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance
2,150 gflops
 
1,490 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
large
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
4 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
 
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB / s
 
80.13 GB / s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620.
Display Connectors
No outputs
 
4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port
1.2
 
no data

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus
+
 
-
3D Vision Pro
+
 
no data
Mosaic
+
 
no data
nView Display Management
+
 
no data
Optimus
+
 
no data
Multi Monitor
no data
 
+
nView
+
 
no data

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12
 
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.0
 
no data
OpenGL
4.5
 
4.6
Vulkan
+
 
+

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

M3000M 17.22 +20.8%
Quadro P620 14.26

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

M3000M 44603 +43.5%
Quadro P620 31073

3DMark Fire Strike Score

M3000M 5972 +32.9%
Quadro P620 4493

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

M3000M 6537 +37.8%
Quadro P620 4745

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

M3000M 8289 +38.5%
Quadro P620 5984

3DMark Vantage Performance

M3000M 27405 +9.2%
Quadro P620 25105

Passmark

M3000M 4022 +13%
Quadro P620 3558

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
253 Mh/s
 
no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

20.8% faster in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 80.13 GB/s)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
3D Vision Pro
nView
Optimus Support

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P620

Much newer (27 May 2019 vs 2 October 2015)
More pipelines (512 vs 1)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (40 vs 75 watts)
Multi Monitor

So, Quadro M3000M or P620?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M3000M.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Like
Like

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the video card, as well as rate it yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M3000M or Quadro P620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.