NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs P620
Comparison of Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
67.2 GTexel / s
43.33 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
160 GB / s
80.13 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
M3000M 17.22 +20.8%
Quadro P620 14.26
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
M3000M 44603 +43.5%
Quadro P620 31073
3DMark Fire Strike Score
M3000M 5972 +32.9%
Quadro P620 4493
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
M3000M 6537 +37.8%
Quadro P620 4745
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
M3000M 8289 +38.5%
Quadro P620 5984
3DMark Vantage Performance
M3000M 27405 +9.2%
Quadro P620 25105
M3000M 4022 +13%
Quadro P620 3558
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
20.8% faster in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 80.13 GB/s)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
3D Vision Pro
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P620
Much newer (27 May 2019 vs 2 October 2015)
More pipelines (512 vs 1)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (40 vs 75 watts)
So, Quadro M3000M or P620?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M3000M.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M3000M and Quadro P620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.