Quadro K5000 vs M3000M

Place in performance ranking	342	406
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.34	4.08
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GM204	GK104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	17 August 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,499
Current price	$981	$289 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K5000 has 74% better value for money than M3000M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1,024	1536
Core clock speed	1050 MHz	706 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	122 Watt
Texture fill rate	67.20	90.37
Floating-point performance	2,150 gflops	2,169 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M3000M and Quadro K5000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	+
CUDA	5.2	3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M3000M 14.30
+38.7%

Quadro K5000 10.31

M3000M outperforms K5000 by 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M3000M 5526
+38.6%

Quadro K5000 3987

M3000M outperforms K5000 by 39% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

M3000M 16099
+41.8%

Quadro K5000 11353

M3000M outperforms K5000 by 42% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

M3000M 16677
+43.1%

Quadro K5000 11652

M3000M outperforms K5000 by 43% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Benchmark coverage: 4%

M3000M 15678
+83.2%

Quadro K5000 8558

M3000M outperforms K5000 by 83% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

M3000M 45
+21.6%

Quadro K5000 37

M3000M outperforms K5000 by 22% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 +45%	40−45 −45%
4K	23 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24
+57.1%

14−16

−57.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +60%	30−33 −60%
Hitman 3	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +60%	30−33 −60%
Hitman 3	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	42 +40%	30−33 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +60%	30−33 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+48.1%

27−30

−48.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Hitman 3	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	30−35 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Hitman 3	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 +40%	10−11 −40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%