GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs Quadro M3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M3000M with GeForce GTX 675M SLI, including specs and performance data.

M3000M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
14.31
+63%

M3000M outperforms GTX 675M SLI by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking343461
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.442.39
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM204N12E-GTX2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years ago)6 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$981 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M3000M has 2% better value for money than GTX 675M SLI.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,024768
Core clock speed1050 MHz620 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt2x 100 Watt
Texture fill rate67.20no data
Floating-point performance2,150 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M3000M and GeForce GTX 675M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+no data
CUDA5.2+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M3000M 14.31
+63%
GTX 675M SLI 8.78

Quadro M3000M outperforms GeForce GTX 675M SLI by 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

M3000M 8289
+29.4%
GTX 675M SLI 6407

Quadro M3000M outperforms GeForce GTX 675M SLI by 29% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

M3000M 27405
+48.9%
GTX 675M SLI 18405

Quadro M3000M outperforms GeForce GTX 675M SLI by 49% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
+90%
30−35
−90%
4K23
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+60%
24−27
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+62.8%
40−45
−62.8%
Hitman 3 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+57.9%
35−40
−57.9%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+53.8%
24−27
−53.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+60%
24−27
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+51.5%
30−35
−51.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+60%
24−27
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+62.8%
40−45
−62.8%
Hitman 3 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+57.9%
35−40
−57.9%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+53.8%
24−27
−53.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+60%
24−27
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+51.5%
30−35
−51.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+62.8%
40−45
−62.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+57.9%
35−40
−57.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+51.5%
30−35
−51.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+60%
24−27
−60%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Hitman 3 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Hitman 3 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%

This is how M3000M and GTX 675M SLI compete in popular games:

  • M3000M is 90% faster in 1080p
  • M3000M is 64% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.31 8.78
Recency 2 October 2015 6 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 2 Watt

The Quadro M3000M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M3000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Quadro M3000M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 315 votes

Rate Quadro M3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.