HD Graphics P630 vs Quadro M1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K2200M Quadro M600M Quadro M620 Quadro M1000M Quadro M1200 Quadro M2000M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P630

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M1200 with HD Graphics P630, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M1200
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
8.27
+169%

M1200 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by a whopping 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking515771
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.7614.25
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Kaby Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)5 August 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640192
Core clock speed1093 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate43.7226.40
Floating-point processing power1.399 TFLOPS0.4224 TFLOPS
ROPs163
TMUs4024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1740 MB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.103
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M1200 8.27
+169%
HD Graphics P630 3.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M1200 3218
+169%
HD Graphics P630 1198

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30
+200%
10−12
−200%
4K11
+175%
4−5
−175%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Fortnite 45−50
+213%
14−16
−213%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
Valorant 80−85
+76.1%
45−50
−76.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+125%
55−60
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Dota 2 55−60
+103%
27−30
−103%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Fortnite 45−50
+213%
14−16
−213%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+263%
8−9
−263%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+211%
9−10
−211%
Valorant 80−85
+76.1%
45−50
−76.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Dota 2 55−60
+103%
27−30
−103%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Valorant 80−85
+76.1%
45−50
−76.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+213%
14−16
−213%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+186%
21−24
−186%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+86.4%
21−24
−86.4%
Valorant 85−90
+218%
27−30
−218%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Valorant 40−45
+167%
14−16
−167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how Quadro M1200 and HD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M1200 is 200% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M1200 is 175% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro M1200 is 700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro M1200 is ahead in 60 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.27 3.08
Recency 11 January 2017 5 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1740 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro M1200 has a 168.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and a 135.4% higher maximum VRAM amount.

HD Graphics P630, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M1200 is a mobile workstation card while HD Graphics P630 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Quadro M1200
Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
K5100M Quadro K5100M
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
Pro 555X Radeon Pro 555X
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
HD Graphics 4400 HD Graphics 4400
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
NVS 5200M NVS 5200M
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
HD Graphics 3000 HD Graphics 3000
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
GTX 550 Ti GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
FirePro W2100 FirePro W2100
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
Quadro M620 Quadro M620
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
Quadro M520 Quadro M520
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
GTS 450 GeForce GTS 450

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 362 votes

Rate Quadro M1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M1200 or HD Graphics P630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.