HD Graphics P630 vs Quadro M2000M

Place in the ranking	492	762
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.24	14.35
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GM107	Kaby Lake GT2
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	3 December 2015 (9 years ago)	5 August 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	192
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1098 MHz	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.92	26.40
Floating-point processing power	1.405 TFLOPS	0.4224 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	3
TMUs	40	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x1
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1740 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.1.103
CUDA	5.0	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M2000M 8.96
+187%

HD Graphics P630 3.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M2000M 3446
+188%

HD Graphics P630 1198

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35 +192%	12−14 −192%
4K	12 +200%	4−5 −200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +54.5%	10−12 −54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +143%	7−8 −143%
Elden Ring	24−27 +317%	6−7 −317%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +263%	8−9 −263%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +54.5%	10−12 −54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +143%	7−8 −143%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +157%	14−16 −157%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +118%	10−12 −118%
Valorant	30−35 +1500%	2−3 −1500%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +263%	8−9 −263%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +54.5%	10−12 −54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +143%	7−8 −143%
Dota 2	20 +122%	9−10 −122%
Elden Ring	24−27 +317%	6−7 −317%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +124%	16−18 −124%
Fortnite	50−55 +212%	16−18 −212%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +157%	14−16 −157%
Grand Theft Auto V	30 +233%	9−10 −233%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +150%	27−30 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +118%	10−12 −118%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +145%	10−12 −145%
Valorant	30−35 +1500%	2−3 −1500%
World of Tanks	130−140 +140%	55−60 −140%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +263%	8−9 −263%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +54.5%	10−12 −54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +143%	7−8 −143%
Dota 2	30−35 +256%	9−10 −256%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +124%	16−18 −124%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +157%	14−16 −157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +150%	27−30 −150%
Valorant	30−35 +1500%	2−3 −1500%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Elden Ring	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +95.5%	21−24 −95.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
World of Tanks	65−70 +195%	21−24 −195%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Valorant	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Dota 2	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%
Elden Ring	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +26.7%	14−16 −26.7%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Dota 2	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Fortnite	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12	0−1
Valorant	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%

This is how M2000M and HD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

M2000M is 192% faster in 1080p
M2000M is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the M2000M is 1800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, M2000M surpassed HD Graphics P630 in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.96	3.12
Recency	3 December 2015	5 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1740 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	15 Watt