GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Quadro K4000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro K4000 with GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2, including specs and performance data.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 522 | 520 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.69 | 0.76 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | GK106 | GF110 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 March 2013 (11 years ago) | 7 December 2010 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | $349 |
| Current price | $330 (0.3x MSRP) | $249 (0.7x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Quadro K4000 has 122% better value for money than GTX 570 Rev. 2.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 | 43.92 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1280 MB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz | 3800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 134.8 GB/s | 152.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.05 | 7.06 |
| Recency | 1 March 2013 | 7 December 2010 |
| Cost | $1269 | $349 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1280 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 219 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro K4000 and GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2.
Be aware that Quadro K4000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
