GeForce 320M vs Quadro K1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1200 with GeForce 320M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K1200
2015
4 GB 128-bit, 45 Watt
7.58
+1304%

Quadro K1200 outperforms GeForce 320M by a whopping 1304% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking4971183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.23no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code nameGM107MCP89
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date28 January 2015 (9 years ago)1 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$321.97 no data
Current price$124 (0.4x MSRP)$408

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K1200 and GeForce 320M have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51232
Core clock speed1058 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate35.977.200
Floating-point performance1,151 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K1200 and GeForce 320M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length160 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidthUp to 80 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsmDP mDP mDP mDPNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.1 (10_1)
Shader Model54.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K1200 7.58
+1304%
GeForce 320M 0.54

Quadro K1200 outperforms GeForce 320M by 1304% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K1200 2929
+1301%
GeForce 320M 209

Quadro K1200 outperforms GeForce 320M by 1301% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+1233%
12
−1233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Hitman 3 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+1233%
12−14
−1233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+1257%
7−8
−1257%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+1233%
9−10
−1233%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Hitman 3 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+1233%
12−14
−1233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+1257%
7−8
−1257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+1233%
9−10
−1233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+1233%
12−14
−1233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+1257%
7−8
−1257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+1233%
9−10
−1233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Hitman 3 80−85
+1233%
6−7
−1233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%

This is how Quadro K1200 and GeForce 320M compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K1200 is 1233% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.58 0.54
Recency 28 January 2015 1 April 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 23 Watt

The Quadro K1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1200 is a workstation card while GeForce 320M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Quadro K1200
NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 87 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 50 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.