GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs Quadro FX 3600M

Place in performance ranking	1015	84
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.15	no data
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	NB8E-GLM	GN20-E6
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	23 February 2008 (16 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$80	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	5888
Core clock speed	500 MHz	915 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1480 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	125 Watt (80 - 125 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	16.00	248.2
Floating-point performance	160 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro FX 3600M and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-HE	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.14 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.6
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.1	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −3833%	118 +3833%
1440p	2−3 −3550%	73 +3550%
4K	1−2 −4700%	48 +4700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−3125%

129
+3125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1178%	110−120 +1178%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2675%	111 +2675%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	120−130
Hitman 3	1−2 −16800%	169 +16800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −9000%	90−95 +9000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −2133%	65−70 +2133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1386%	100−110 +1386%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1178%	110−120 +1178%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2125%	89 +2125%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	120−130
Hitman 3	1−2 −15900%	160 +15900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −9000%	90−95 +9000%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −4650%	95 +4650%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −2133%	65−70 +2133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1700%	126 +1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −4600%	188 +4600%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1925%	81 +1925%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	120−130
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2475%	103 +2475%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2233%	70−75 +2233%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2300%	96 +2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −650%	60−65 +650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −1560%	83 +1560%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −4900%	50 +4900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −4900%	100 +4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −6100%	60−65 +6100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −3800%	35−40 +3800%
Hitman 3	1−2 −5300%	54 +5300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	21−24

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	27−30
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1867%	59 +1867%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%

This is how FX 3600M and RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 3833% faster in 1080p
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 3550% faster in 1440p
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 4700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 16800% faster than the FX 3600M.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3070 Ti Mobile surpassed FX 3600M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.20	41.95
Recency	23 February 2008	4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	125 Watt