Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Quadro 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000 Mac Edition Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000 SDI Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070-Q Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 7500 XT Radeon RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7650 GRE Radeon RX 7700 Radeon RX 7700 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7900 GRE Radeon RX 7900 XT Radeon RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7950 XT Radeon RX 7950 XTX Radeon RX 7990 XTX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 6000 with Radeon RX 7700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 6000
2010
6 GB GDDR5, 204 Watt
6.04

RX 7700 XT outperforms 6000 by a whopping 730% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
RX 7700 XT RX 7700 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking56846
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1771.42
Power efficiency2.3416.17
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGF100Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 December 2010 (14 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,399 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 7700 XT has 41912% better value for money than Quadro 6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4483456
Core clock speed574 MHz1435 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2544 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14549.5
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS35.17 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs56216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length248 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed747 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 6000 6.04
RX 7700 XT 50.16
+730%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 6000 2701
RX 7700 XT 22416
+730%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−781%
185
+781%
1440p12−14
−750%
102
+750%
4K7−8
−743%
59
+743%

Cost per frame, $

1080p209.48
−8531%
2.43
+8531%
1440p366.58
−8228%
4.40
+8228%
4K628.43
−8158%
7.61
+8158%
  • RX 7700 XT has 8531% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT has 8228% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT has 8158% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 265
+0%
265
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 351
+0%
351
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 193
+0%
193
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 199
+0%
199
+0%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 344
+0%
344
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 158
+0%
158
+0%
Far Cry 5 188
+0%
188
+0%
Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 278
+0%
278
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 119
+0%
119
+0%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 243
+0%
243
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 132
+0%
132
+0%
Far Cry 5 181
+0%
181
+0%
Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 272
+0%
272
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 166
+0%
166
+0%
Metro Exodus 152
+0%
152
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 295
+0%
295
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 167
+0%
167
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 231
+0%
231
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+0%
168
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+0%
80
+0%
Far Cry 5 157
+0%
157
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 197
+0%
197
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120
+0%
120
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 112
+0%
112
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89
+0%
89
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+0%
134
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how Quadro 6000 and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is 781% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT is 750% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT is 743% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.04 50.16
Recency 10 December 2010 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 245 Watt

Quadro 6000 has 20.1% lower power consumption.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has a 730.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 6000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Quadro 6000
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
RX 7700 XT Radeon RX 7700 XT
vs
RX 7700 Radeon RX 7700
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
GRID K2 GRID K2
RTX A6000 NVIDIA RTX A6000
vs
Quadro 6000 6000
T400 T400
vs
Quadro 6000 6000
RTX A2000 12 GB NVIDIA A2000 12 GB
vs
Quadro 6000 6000
RTX 4070 NVIDIA RTX 4070
vs
Quadro 6000 6000
RTX 4090 NVIDIA RTX 4090
vs
Quadro 6000 6000
RTX 4070 Ti NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti
vs
Quadro 6000 6000
W5130M FirePro W5130M
vs
Quadro 4000 4000
Quadro 4000M Quadro 4000M
vs
Quadro 4000 4000
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
vs
Quadro 4000 4000
GeForce 930M GeForce 930M
vs
Quadro 4000 4000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 40 votes

Rate Quadro 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1912 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 6000 or Radeon RX 7700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.