Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Quadro 5000M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000M with Radeon PRO WX 2100, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 5000M
2010
1792 MB GDDR5, 100 Watt
4.60
+10.6%

5000M outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking628652
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.56
Power efficiency3.669.46
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF100Lexa
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 July 2010 (14 years ago)4 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320512
Core clock speed405 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1219 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate16.2039.01
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPS1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 5000M 4.60
+10.6%
PRO WX 2100 4.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 5000M 2059
+10.8%
PRO WX 2100 1858

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Fortnite 30−33
+15.4%
24−27
−15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Valorant 60−65
+5.2%
55−60
−5.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+7.6%
75−80
−7.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Dota 2 40−45
+7.7%
35−40
−7.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Fortnite 30−33
+15.4%
24−27
−15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Valorant 60−65
+5.2%
55−60
−5.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Dota 2 40−45
+7.7%
35−40
−7.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Valorant 60−65
+5.2%
55−60
−5.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+15.4%
24−27
−15.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+11.8%
30−35
−11.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+6.1%
30−35
−6.1%
Valorant 55−60
+12.2%
45−50
−12.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+8.7%
21−24
−8.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro 5000M is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro 5000M is ahead in 54 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.60 4.16
Recency 27 July 2010 4 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro 5000M has a 10.6% higher aggregate performance score.

PRO WX 2100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 14.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro 5000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000M or Radeon PRO WX 2100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.