GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Quadro 5000M

Place in the ranking	621	10
Place by popularity	not in top-100	13
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	67.35
Power efficiency	3.69	24.46
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GF100	AD104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 July 2010 (14 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	7168
Core clock speed	405 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2475 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	220 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.20	554.4
Floating-point processing power	0.5184 TFLOPS	35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	80
TMUs	40	224
Tensor Cores	no data	224
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	1792 MB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 5000M 5.36

RTX 4070 SUPER 78.16
+1358%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 5000M 2059

RTX 4070 SUPER 30037
+1359%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 −1457%	218 +1457%
1440p	9−10 −1511%	145 +1511%
4K	5−6 −1600%	85 +1600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.75
1440p	no data	4.13
4K	no data	7.05

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1331%	186 +1331%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −1355%	160−170 +1355%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −631%	110−120 +631%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1300%	182 +1300%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −1355%	160−170 +1355%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −1873%	434 +1873%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 −1791%	200−210 +1791%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −1085%	150−160 +1085%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −806%	140−150 +806%
Valorant	16−18 −2644%	400−450 +2644%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −631%	110−120 +631%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −1123%	159 +1123%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −1355%	160−170 +1355%
Dota 2	18−20 −861%	173 +861%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −485%	152 +485%
Fortnite	30−35 −894%	300−350 +894%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −1845%	428 +1845%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 −1791%	200−210 +1791%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −861%	173 +861%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −469%	74 +469%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −378%	210−220 +378%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −806%	140−150 +806%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −924%	170−180 +924%
Valorant	16−18 −2644%	400−450 +2644%
World of Tanks	85−90 −221%	270−280 +221%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −631%	110−120 +631%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −969%	139 +969%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −1355%	160−170 +1355%
Dota 2	18−20 −1344%	260−270 +1344%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −465%	140−150 +465%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −1632%	381 +1632%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 −1791%	200−210 +1791%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −378%	210−220 +378%
Valorant	16−18 −2644%	400−450 +2644%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	5−6 −2860%	148 +2860%
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7 −2367%	148 +2367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −415%	170−180 +415%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2225%	90−95 +2225%
World of Tanks	35−40 −1223%	500−550 +1223%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −988%	85−90 +988%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5 −1275%	55−60 +1275%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1300%	70−75 +1300%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −1355%	160−170 +1355%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −2844%	265 +2844%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 −2143%	150−160 +2143%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −2640%	130−140 +2640%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −1825%	154 +1825%
Valorant	14−16 −2536%	350−400 +2536%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −400%	55−60 +400%
Dota 2	16−18 −876%	166 +876%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −938%	166 +938%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −7300%	74 +7300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −1293%	200−210 +1293%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −2033%	60−65 +2033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −876%	166 +876%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −2175%	90−95 +2175%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −72.7%	19 +72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%
Dota 2	16−18 −1312%	240−250 +1312%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1650%	100−110 +1650%
Fortnite	5−6 −1820%	95−100 +1820%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2540%	132 +2540%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 −3233%	100−105 +3233%
Valorant	5−6 −4200%	210−220 +4200%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

30−35

+0%

30−35

+0%

This is how Quadro 5000M and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 SUPER is 1457% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 1511% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 1600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 7300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4070 SUPER is ahead in 55 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.36	78.16
Recency	27 July 2010	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	1792 MB	12 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	220 Watt

Quadro 5000M has 120% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 1358.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 585.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.