GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Quadro 3000M

Place in the ranking	814	9
Place by popularity	not in top-100	12
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.20	67.32
Power efficiency	2.39	24.70
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GF104	AD104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	22 February 2011 (13 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$398.96	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 SUPER has 33560% better value for money than Quadro 3000M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	240	7168
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2475 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	220 Watt
Texture fill rate	18.00	554.4
Floating-point processing power	0.432 TFLOPS	35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	80
TMUs	40	224
Tensor Cores	no data	224
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	625 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	2.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 3000M 2.58

RTX 4070 SUPER 78.24
+2933%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 3000M 995

RTX 4070 SUPER 30192
+2934%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro 3000M 1539

RTX 4070 SUPER 68373
+4343%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	44 −407%	223 +407%
1440p	4−5 −3550%	146 +3550%
4K	2−3 −4100%	84 +4100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
−2900%

150−160

+2900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −1888%	150−160 +1888%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	140−150
Battlefield 5	3−4 −8033%	240−250 +8033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −2900%	150−160 +2900%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2260%	110−120 +2260%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −2671%	190−200 +2671%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1808%	240−250 +1808%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1743%	120−130 +1743%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −1290%	270−280 +1290%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −7650%	150−160 +7650%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1967%	120−130 +1967%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −2964%	300−350 +2964%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −305%	150−160 +305%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −1888%	150−160 +1888%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	140−150
Battlefield 5	3−4 −8033%	240−250 +8033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −2900%	150−160 +2900%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2260%	110−120 +2260%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −2671%	190−200 +2671%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1808%	240−250 +1808%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1743%	120−130 +1743%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −1290%	270−280 +1290%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −7650%	150−160 +7650%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1967%	120−130 +1967%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −3791%	428 +3791%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −1215%	170−180 +1215%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −305%	150−160 +305%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −1888%	150−160 +1888%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	140−150
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −2900%	150−160 +2900%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2260%	110−120 +2260%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1808%	240−250 +1808%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1743%	120−130 +1743%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −1290%	270−280 +1290%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −3364%	381 +3364%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −1446%	201 +1446%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −266%	139 +266%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−1967%

120−130
+1967%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −4050%	160−170 +4050%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −2700%	110−120 +2700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −4550%	90−95 +4550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −4000%	80−85 +4000%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2700%	80−85 +2700%
Hitman 3	8−9 −1325%	110−120 +1325%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −2843%	200−210 +2843%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −7600%	154 +7600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −1500%	240−250 +1500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−1950%

120−130
+1950%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −8700%	85−90 +8700%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −6800%	65−70 +6800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −3250%	65−70 +3250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −6300%	60−65 +6300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −5100%	50−55 +5100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	62

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−2150%

90−95
+2150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	265 +0%	265 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	133 +0%	133 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	132 +0%	132 +0%

This is how Quadro 3000M and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 SUPER is 407% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 3550% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 4100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 8700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4070 SUPER is ahead in 52 tests (84%)
there's a draw in 10 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.58	78.24
Recency	22 February 2011	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	220 Watt

Quadro 3000M has 193.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 2932.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 3000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 3000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.