GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile vs Quadro 5000M

Place in performance ranking	580	63
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.08	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Fermi	GN20-E8
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 July 2010 (13 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$3732	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	7424
Core clock speed	405 MHz	975 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1590 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	16.20	292.3
Floating-point performance	518.4 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro 5000M and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 5000M 5.33

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 45.97
+762%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro 5000M by 762% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro 5000M 7767

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 94760
+1120%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile outperforms Quadro 5000M by 1120% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16−18 −769%	139 +769%
1440p	9−10 −833%	84 +833%
4K	6−7 −900%	60 +900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10

−1411%

136
+1411%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −670%	75−80 +670%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −2260%	118 +2260%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −950%	140−150 +950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −742%	100−110 +742%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −1278%	124 +1278%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −418%	85−90 +418%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −746%	110−120 +746%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −621%	130−140 +621%
Hitman 3	12−14 −1742%	221 +1742%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −1267%	287 +1267%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −650%	100−110 +650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −1529%	277 +1529%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −1463%	125 +1463%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −670%	75−80 +670%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −1900%	100 +1900%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −950%	140−150 +950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −742%	100−110 +742%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −1033%	102 +1033%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −506%	103 +506%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −315%	54 +315%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −621%	130−140 +621%
Hitman 3	12−14 −567%	80 +567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −1152%	263 +1152%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −800%	108 +800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −650%	100−110 +650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −1035%	193 +1035%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1927%	223 +1927%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −1338%	115 +1338%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −670%	75−80 +670%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −1640%	87 +1640%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −742%	100−110 +742%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −911%	91 +911%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −418%	85−90 +418%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −621%	130−140 +621%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −824%	194 +824%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −700%	96 +700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −973%	118 +973%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −950%	84 +950%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−650%

100−110
+650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −810%	90−95 +810%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −1443%	100−110 +1443%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1060%	55−60 +1060%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1167%	35−40 +1167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −929%	70−75 +929%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2700%	56 +2700%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1350%	116 +1350%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1000%	95−100 +1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1183%	154 +1183%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −3000%	93 +3000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1620%	86 +1620%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −3250%	67 +3250%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	14−16 −514%	86 +514%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1967%	60−65 +1967%
Hitman 3	1−2 −3700%	35−40 +3700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1580%	84 +1580%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −3500%	72 +3500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −8400%	85 +8400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −967%	30−35 +967%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −2300%	48 +2300%
Battlefield 5	0−1	55−60
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2200%	45−50 +2200%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	28
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1220%	65−70 +1220%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1660%	88 +1660%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −943%	73 +943%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −4100%	42 +4100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−600%

40−45
+600%

This is how Quadro 5000M and RTX 3080 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 769% faster in 1080p
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 833% faster in 1440p
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 8400% faster than the Quadro 5000M.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3080 Ti Mobile surpassed Quadro 5000M in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.33	45.97
Recency	27 July 2010	4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt