Quadro T500 Mobile vs Quadro 5000M

Place in the ranking	611	483
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.92	35.84
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF100	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	27 July 2010 (14 years ago)	2 December 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	896
Core clock speed	405 MHz	1365 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.20	94.92
Floating-point processing power	0.5184 TFLOPS	3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	40	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1792 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21−24 −71.4%	36 +71.4%
1440p	9−10 −66.7%	15 +66.7%
4K	10−12 −70%	17 +70%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10

−55.6%

14−16
+55.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −57.1%	21−24 +57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −150%	30 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −66.7%	24−27 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −76.5%	60−65 +76.5%
Hitman 3	10−12 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −47.1%	50−55 +47.1%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −27.7%	60−65 +27.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −57.1%	21−24 +57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −133%	28 +133%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −66.7%	24−27 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −76.5%	60−65 +76.5%
Hitman 3	10−12 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −47.1%	50−55 +47.1%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −115%	27−30 +115%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −55.6%	28 +55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −27.7%	60−65 +27.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −57.1%	21−24 +57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −125%	27 +125%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −76.5%	60−65 +76.5%
Hitman 3	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −5.6%	19 +5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −27.7%	60−65 +27.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−50%

21−24
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	5−6
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Hitman 3	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −67.6%	55−60 +67.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−60%

16−18
+60%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Hitman 3	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −300%	35−40 +300%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−50%

9−10
+50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

This is how Quadro 5000M and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

T500 Mobile is 71% faster in 1080p
T500 Mobile is 67% faster in 1440p
T500 Mobile is 70% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T500 Mobile is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T500 Mobile is ahead in 50 tests (76%)
there's a draw in 16 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.34	8.79
Recency	27 July 2010	2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount	1792 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	18 Watt

T500 Mobile has a 64.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 14.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 455.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.