GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs Quadro 2000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 2000M with GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 2000M
2011
2 GB DDR3, 55 Watt
1.71

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms 2000M by a whopping 3865% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking96021
Place by popularitynot in top-10035
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2870.04
Power efficiency2.5124.90
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF106AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 January 2011 (14 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$46.56 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 4070 SUPER has 24914% better value for money than Quadro 2000M.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1927168
Core clock speed550 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate17.60554.4
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs32224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cache256 KB7 MB
L2 Cache256 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 2000M 1.71
RTX 4070 SUPER 67.81
+3865%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 2000M 757
Samples: 632
RTX 4070 SUPER 29979
+3860%
Samples: 11637

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro 2000M 1261
RTX 4070 SUPER 68373
+5322%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD38
−471%
217
+471%
1440p3−4
−4367%
134
+4367%
4K2−3
−4000%
82
+4000%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.23
+125%
2.76
−125%
1440p15.52
−247%
4.47
+247%
4K23.28
−219%
7.30
+219%
  • Quadro 2000M has 125% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER has 247% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER has 219% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−10667%
300−350
+10667%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4800%
196
+4800%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−2667%
160−170
+2667%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5
−4550%
180−190
+4550%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−10667%
300−350
+10667%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4500%
184
+4500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−3960%
203
+3960%
Fortnite 7−8
−4214%
300−350
+4214%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2830%
290−300
+2830%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−6967%
210−220
+6967%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−2667%
160−170
+2667%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1491%
170−180
+1491%
Valorant 35−40
−1032%
400−450
+1032%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5
−4550%
180−190
+4550%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−10667%
300−350
+10667%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−632%
270−280
+632%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3875%
159
+3875%
Dota 2 21−24
−3710%
800−850
+3710%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−3900%
200
+3900%
Fortnite 7−8
−4214%
300−350
+4214%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2830%
290−300
+2830%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−6967%
210−220
+6967%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−5667%
173
+5667%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−2667%
160−170
+2667%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−6067%
185
+6067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1491%
170−180
+1491%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−5050%
412
+5050%
Valorant 35−40
−1032%
400−450
+1032%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
−4550%
180−190
+4550%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3500%
144
+3500%
Dota 2 21−24
−3710%
800−850
+3710%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−3700%
190
+3700%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2830%
290−300
+2830%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−2667%
160−170
+2667%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1491%
170−180
+1491%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−2413%
201
+2413%
Valorant 35−40
−1032%
400−450
+1032%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
−4214%
300−350
+4214%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−4480%
220−230
+4480%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−3869%
500−550
+3869%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−929%
170−180
+929%
Valorant 12−14
−3942%
450−500
+3942%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9100%
92
+9100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−9050%
183
+9050%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−5060%
250−260
+5060%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−7600%
154
+7600%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−4933%
150−160
+4933%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1007%
166
+1007%
Valorant 9−10
−3567%
300−350
+3567%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Far Cry 5 0−1 103
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 210−220
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−3100%
95−100
+3100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−2533%
75−80
+2533%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 148
+0%
148
+0%
Metro Exodus 118
+0%
118
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 74
+0%
74
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 133
+0%
133
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how Quadro 2000M and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 471% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 4367% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 4000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 10667% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER performs better in 50 tests (82%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (18%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.71 67.81
Recency 13 January 2011 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 220 Watt

Quadro 2000M has 300% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 3865.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 2000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Quadro 2000M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 98 votes

Rate Quadro 2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 6858 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 2000M or GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.