Radeon RX Vega 7 vs P106-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 GP106 P102-100 P102-101 P104-100 P104-101 P106-090 P106-100
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 3 5 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 7 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9 10

Aggregate performance score

P106-100
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
16.55
+123%

P106-100 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 7 by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P106-100 P106-100
RX Vega 7 RX Vega 7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking305501
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.2710.95
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameGP106Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 June 2017 (6 years ago)7 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$14.65 $387

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

P106-100 has 3% better value for money than RX Vega 7.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280448
Core clock speed1506 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1709 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate136.7no data
Floating-point performance4,375 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on P106-100 and Radeon RX Vega 7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length250 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed8008 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA6.1no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+117%
23
−117%
1440p85−90
+118%
39
−118%
4K35−40
+106%
17
−106%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.55 7.42
Recency 19 June 2017 7 January 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 15 Watt

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that P106-100 is a desktop card while Radeon RX Vega 7 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Radeon RX Vega 7
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P106-100 P106 100
vs
R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
RX Vega 7 Radeon RX Vega 7
vs
R7 260 Radeon R7 260
P106-100 P106 100
vs
R9 285 Radeon R9 285
P106-100 P106 100
vs
GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
P106-100 P106 100
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q
P106-100 P106 100
vs
GP106 GP106
P106-100 P106 100
vs
RX 560 XT Radeon RX 560 XT
P106-100 P106 100
vs
RX 590 GME Radeon RX 590 GME
P106-100 P106 100
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
P106-100 P106 100
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
P106-100 P106 100
vs
GT 710 PCIe x1 GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 118 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4518 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.