Radeon Vega 7 vs P102-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics 320SP Graphics 384SP Mobile Graphics 448SP Mobile Graphics 512SP Mobile Vega 7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P102-100 with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

P102-100
2018, $599
5 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
8.58
+27.5%

P102-100 outperforms Vega 7 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P102-100 P102-100
Vega 7 Vega 7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking541606
Place by popularitynot in top-10016
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.92no data
Power efficiency2.6411.52
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102Cezanne
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 February 2018 (8 years ago)13 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3200448
Core clock speed1582 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate336.653.20
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs808
TMUs20028
L1 Cache1.2 MBno data
L2 Cache2.5 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount5 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1376 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
+22.7%
22
−22.7%
1440p35−40
+25%
28
−25%
4K21−24
+16.7%
18
−16.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p22.19no data
1440p17.11no data
4K28.52no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 63
+0%
63
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Fortnite 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+0%
17
+0%
Metro Exodus 13
+0%
13
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
+0%
23
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+0%
18
+0%
Valorant 73
+0%
73
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27
+0%
27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 25
+0%
25
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14
+0%
14
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 48
+0%
48
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 25
+0%
25
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how P102-100 and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • P102-100 is 23% faster in 1080p
  • P102-100 is 25% faster in 1440p
  • P102-100 is 17% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.58 6.73
Recency 12 February 2018 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 45 Watt

P102-100 has a 27% higher aggregate performance score.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 129% more advanced lithography process, and 456% lower power consumption.

The P102-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P102-100 P102 100
vs
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
vs
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
P102-100 P102 100
vs
T400 T400
P102-100 P102 100
vs
Radeon 625 Radeon 625
P102-100 P102 100
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
P102-100 P102 100
vs
Millennium G450 LP
P102-100 P102 100
vs
R9 M390 Mac Edition R9 M390 Mac Edition
P102-100 P102 100
vs
Pro W6800X Pro W6800X
P102-100 P102 100
vs
RX 640 OEM RX 640 OEM
P102-100 P102 100
vs
Tesla T4G Tesla T4G
P102-100 P102 100
vs
PRO W7900 PRO W7900
P102-100 P102 100
vs
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
P102-100 P102 100
vs
RTX 5090 D V2 RTX 5090 D V2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 41 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3424 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P102-100 or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.