GeForce GT 625 OEM vs Oland

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Oland and GeForce GT 625 OEM, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Oland
3.67
+222%

Oland outperforms GT 625 OEM by a whopping 222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7141079
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.89
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameOlandGF119
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data18 February 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38448
Core clock speedno data874 MHz
Number of transistors950 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data29 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.992
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1678 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data825 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data13.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)1.1
Vulkan1.2.170N/A
CUDA-2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.67 1.14
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

Oland has a 221.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Oland is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 625 OEM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Oland
Oland
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
GeForce GT 625 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Oland on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 58 votes

Rate GeForce GT 625 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.