GeForce2 Go vs GeForce GT 740

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	702	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.19	no data
Power efficiency	1.37	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code name	GK107	NV11 B2
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	29 May 2014 (10 years ago)	11 November 2000 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$89	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	no data
Core clock speed	993 MHz	143 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	20 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	64 Watt	2 Watt
Texture fill rate	31.78	0.57
Floating-point processing power	0.7626 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	2
TMUs	32	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 4x
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	166 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	7.0
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.2
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.0	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	29 May 2014	11 November 2000
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	64 Watt	2 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---