GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 and GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 3870 X2
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 110 Watt
2.13
+4.4%

ATI Mobility HD 3870 X2 outperforms GT 755M Mac Edition by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking891897
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.392.93
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameM88GK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2008 (16 years ago)8 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320 ×2384
Core clock speed660 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistors666 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate10.56 ×234.72
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS ×20.8333 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×216
TMUs16 ×232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB ×21 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth54.4 GB/s ×280 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Fortnite 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Valorant 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Fortnite 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Valorant 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Valorant 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Valorant 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Valorant 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.13 2.04
Recency 1 September 2008 8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 50 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3870 X2 has a 4.4% higher aggregate performance score.

GT 755M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 and GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 or GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.