A10G vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 with A10G, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.93

A10G outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 344% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking42566
Place by popularity35not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.55
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores969216
Core clock speedno data1320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1710 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data492.5
Floating-point processing powerno data31.52 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data288
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1563 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−341%
150−160
+341%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−332%
95−100
+332%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−333%
130−140
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−323%
300−310
+323%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−331%
250−260
+331%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−333%
130−140
+333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−329%
150−160
+329%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−341%
150−160
+341%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−332%
95−100
+332%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−333%
130−140
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−323%
300−310
+323%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−331%
250−260
+331%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−329%
150−160
+329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−333%
130−140
+333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−329%
150−160
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−329%
120−130
+329%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−341%
150−160
+341%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−333%
130−140
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−323%
300−310
+323%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−329%
120−130
+329%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−332%
95−100
+332%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−329%
90−95
+329%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−329%
210−220
+329%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−338%
210−220
+338%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.93 48.53
Recency 15 August 2020 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm

A10G has a 344% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The A10G is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while A10G is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA A10G
A10G

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2469 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 40 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.