GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P580 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Iris Pro Graphics P580
2015
64 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
5.23

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P580 by a whopping 286% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking611268
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Power efficiency24.1527.98
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSkylake GT4eTU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5761024
Core clock speed350 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors189 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate75.6095.04
Floating-point processing power1.21 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs932
TMUs7264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 5.23
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.20
+286%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 2020
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+286%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−314%
58
+314%
1440p10−12
−330%
43
+330%
4K6−7
−350%
27
+350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−556%
59
+556%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−336%
61
+336%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−717%
49
+717%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−371%
65−70
+371%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−382%
53
+382%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−411%
46
+411%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−527%
69
+527%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−460%
84
+460%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−276%
120−130
+276%
Hitman 3 10−12
−364%
51
+364%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−448%
181
+448%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−600%
91
+600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−214%
44
+214%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−253%
65−70
+253%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−328%
201
+328%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−433%
32
+433%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−371%
65−70
+371%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−327%
47
+327%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−300%
36
+300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−427%
58
+427%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−293%
59
+293%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−276%
120−130
+276%
Hitman 3 10−12
−355%
50
+355%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−445%
180
+445%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−508%
79
+508%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−179%
39
+179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−295%
75
+295%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−289%
183
+289%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−92.9%
27
+92.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−150%
15
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−182%
31
+182%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−278%
34
+278%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−255%
39
+255%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−276%
120−130
+276%
Hitman 3 10−12
−291%
43
+291%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−93.9%
64
+93.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−232%
63
+232%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−117%
39
+117%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+114%
22
−114%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−193%
41
+193%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−290%
35−40
+290%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−375%
38
+375%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 18−20
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16
+700%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−333%
26
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−769%
110−120
+769%
Hitman 3 9−10
−211%
28
+211%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−242%
40−45
+242%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1167%
35−40
+1167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−264%
120
+264%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−267%
30−35
+267%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−567%
20
+567%
Hitman 3 1−2
−1500%
16
+1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−367%
42
+367%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2400%
25
+2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6
Far Cry 5 3−4
−300%
12
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 314% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 330% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 350% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 114% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Pro Graphics P580 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 67 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.23 20.20
Recency 1 September 2015 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P580 has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 286.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P580 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics P580
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1611 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.