GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking615not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.35no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSkylake GT4eTU117B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)15 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5761024
Core clock speed350 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1515 MHz
Number of transistors189 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate75.6096.96
Floating-point processing power1.21 TFLOPS3.103 TFLOPS
ROPs932
TMUs7264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P580 has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics P580
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 156 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.