Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
NVIDIA GeForce MX110

General info

Comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
 
Maxwell
Code name
Haswell GT3e
 
N16V-GMR1
Type
Laptop
 
Laptop
Release date
5 June 2013
 
1 January 2018

Technical specs

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
40
 
256
Core clock speed
200 MHz
 
965 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
 
993 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
 
no data
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
 
28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
 
30 Watt
Texture fill rate
52 GTexel / s
 
23.83 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
 
762.6 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
medium sized
 
no data
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
 
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
no data
 
None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
eDRAM
 
GDDR5 / DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
 
2 GB
Memory bus width
no data
 
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
no data
 
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
no data
 
40.1 GB / s
Shared memory
+
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110.
Display Connectors
No outputs
 
No outputs

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision
-
 
+
GameWorks
-
 
+
Optimus
-
 
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
-
 
+
CUDA
-
 
+
Quick Sync
+
 
no data
Verde Drivers
no data
 
+

API support

APIs supported by Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
 
DirectX 12, Shader 5.0
OpenGL
4.3
 
4.6

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 5.96 +15.5%
GeForce MX110 5.16

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 110085
GeForce MX110 126027 +14.5%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 11930 +7.6%
GeForce MX110 11086

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1340
GeForce MX110 1644 +22.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1381
GeForce MX110 1718 +24.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1923
GeForce MX110 2131 +10.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 8692
GeForce MX110 9124 +5%

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 21
GeForce MX110 22 +4.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

15.5% faster in synthetic tests
Finer manufacturing process technology (22 vs 28 nm)
Quick Sync (hardware acceleration of video encoding and decoding for Intel CPUs. Speeds up video encoding by times, but at the cost of somewhat lower quality)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Much newer (1 January 2018 vs 5 June 2013)
More pipelines (256 vs 40)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
Verde Drivers
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
3D Vision
3DTV Play
GameWorks
3D Vision Surround
Optimus Support

So, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or MX110?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Should you still have questions on choice between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Like
Like

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the video card, as well as rate it yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or GeForce MX110, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.