Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110 architecture, market type and release date.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
52 GTexel / s
23.83 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
GDDR5 / DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
40.1 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
APIs supported by Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
DirectX 12, Shader 5.0
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 5.96 +15.5%
GeForce MX110 5.16
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 110085
GeForce MX110 126027 +14.5%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 11930 +7.6%
GeForce MX110 11086
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1340
GeForce MX110 1644 +22.7%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1381
GeForce MX110 1718 +24.4%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1923
GeForce MX110 2131 +10.8%
3DMark Vantage Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 8692
GeForce MX110 9124 +5%
Unigine Heaven 3.0
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 21
GeForce MX110 22 +4.8%
Let's see how good Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
15.5% faster in synthetic tests
Finer manufacturing process technology (22 vs 28 nm)
Quick Sync (hardware acceleration of video encoding and decoding for Intel CPUs. Speeds up video encoding by times, but at the cost of somewhat lower quality)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Much newer (1 January 2018 vs 5 June 2013)
More pipelines (256 vs 40)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
3D Vision Surround
So, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or MX110?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Should you still have questions on choice between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce MX110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.