Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

Place in performance ranking	651	494
Place by popularity	not in top-100	59
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	28 May 2019 (4 years ago)	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	80
Core clock speed	300 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12-25 Watt	28 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 4.02

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.61
+89.3%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) by 89% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 8812

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729
+147%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) by 147% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 3225

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5332
+65.3%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) by 65% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 2124

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 4010
+88.8%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) by 89% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 14910

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21818
+46.3%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) by 46% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 82914

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 166479
+101%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) by 101% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 31

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 44
+43.6%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) by 44% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	17 −11.8%	19 +11.8%
1440p	5−6 −100%	10 +100%
4K	7−8 −100%	14 +100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

−100%

14
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	11 −36.4%	14−16 +36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −850%	19 +850%
Battlefield 5	14 −85.7%	26 +85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −85.7%	13 +85.7%
Far Cry 5	11 −81.8%	20 +81.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −238%	27 +238%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −117%	24−27 +117%
Hitman 3	8−9 −250%	28 +250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −114%	15 +114%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −188%	23 +188%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10 −70%	17 +70%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −300%	16 +300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −700%	16 +700%
Battlefield 5	13 −76.9%	23 +76.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −42.9%	10 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	10 −90%	19 +90%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −213%	25 +213%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −117%	24−27 +117%
Hitman 3	8−9 −175%	22 +175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −100%	12 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +33.3%	6 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −63.6%	18 +63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −69.2%	22 +69.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −250%	14 +250%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Battlefield 5	12 −91.7%	23 +91.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −14.3%	8 +14.3%
Far Cry 5	9 −100%	18 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −175%	22 +175%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −117%	24−27 +117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7 −57.1%	11 +57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Hitman 3	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −100%	12 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −150%	10 +150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Hitman 3	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 12% faster in 1080p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 100% faster in 1440p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is 33% faster than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 850% faster than the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU).

All in all, in popular games: