Quadro RTX 6000 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650

Place in performance ranking	614	57
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.72	10.10
Architecture	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Kaby Lake GT3e	TU102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	3 January 2017 (7 years ago)	13 August 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$6,299
Current price	$949	$3083 (0.5x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 6000 has 1303% better value for money than Iris Plus Graphics 650.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	4608
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1440 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	55.20	509.8
Floating-point performance	883 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro RTX 6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.103	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 4.54

RTX 6000 48.74
+974%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 650 by 974% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1757

RTX 6000 18872
+974%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 650 by 974% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−945%

230−240
+945%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9

−963%

85−90
+963%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −900%	130−140 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −967%	160−170 +967%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −971%	150−160 +971%
Hitman 3	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −900%	120−130 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −900%	130−140 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −967%	160−170 +967%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −971%	150−160 +971%
Hitman 3	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −900%	120−130 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Battlefield 5	12−14 −900%	130−140 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −956%	95−100 +956%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −971%	150−160 +971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Hitman 3	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −900%	110−120 +900%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −963%	85−90 +963%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%

This is how Iris Plus Graphics 650 and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

RTX 6000 is 945% faster than Iris Plus Graphics 650 in 1080p

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	4.54	48.74
Recency	3 January 2017	13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	260 Watt