Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650: specs and benchmarks

VS
Price now 949$
Games supported 64%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x1
  • Core clock speed 300
  • Max video memory 32768 Mb
  • Memory type DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
  • Memory clock speed System Shared
  • Maximum resolution
Year of release 2017
Performance 5.95

Summary

Intel started Iris Plus Graphics 650 sales 3 January 2017. This is Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture notebook card based on 14 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 3.0 x1 interface. Power consumption is at 15 Watt.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at

5.95%

of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.

General info

Of Iris Plus Graphics 650's architecture, market segment and release date.

Place in performance rating542
Value for money1.28
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3e
Market segmentLaptop
Release date3 January 2017 (5 years ago)
Current price$949 of 49999 (A100 SXM4)
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

Iris Plus Graphics 650's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Iris Plus Graphics 650's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48of 18432 (AD102)
Core clock speed300 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed1100 MHzof 2903 (Radeon Pro W6600)
Number of transistors189 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology14 nmof 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti)
Thermal design power (TDP)15 Wattof 900 (Tesla S2050)
Texture fill rate55.20of 939.8 (H100 SXM5)
Floating-point performance883 gflopsof 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Iris Plus Graphics 650's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Iris Plus Graphics 650: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount32 GBof 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width64/128 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedof 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti)
Shared memory+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Iris Plus Graphics 650. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Iris Plus Graphics 650. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+

API support

APIs supported by Iris Plus Graphics 650, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL2.1
Vulkan1.1.103

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance of Iris Plus Graphics 650. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 5.95
  • Passmark
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1757

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Iris Plus Graphics 650 2762

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Plus Graphics 650 13153

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1655

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1698

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Iris Plus Graphics 650 161538

Game benchmarks

Let's see how good Iris Plus Graphics 650 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD22

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
Battlefield 5 6−7
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 6−7
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
Hitman 3 6−7
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
Battlefield 5 6−7
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 6−7
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
Hitman 3 6−7
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
Metro Exodus 6−7
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
Battlefield 5 6−7
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 6−7
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
Hitman 3 6−7
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
Metro Exodus 6−7
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
Battlefield 5 6−7
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 6−7
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
Hitman 3 6−7
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
Metro Exodus 6−7
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
Battlefield 5 6−7
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 6−7
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7

Relative perfomance

Overall Iris Plus Graphics 650 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.


Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Radeon RX Vega 8
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 640 Radeon RX 640
Compare
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 Iris Pro Graphics 580
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Radeon RX Vega 10
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 GeForce MX230
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 M380 Radeon R7 M380
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Iris Plus Graphics 650 according to our statistics.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


2.7 72 ratings

Rate Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Iris Plus Graphics 650, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.