GeForce 7000M vs Iris Plus Graphics 650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Plus Graphics 650 and GeForce 7000M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Plus Graphics 650
2017
32 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
4.55
+15067%

Iris Plus Graphics 650 outperforms 7000M by a whopping 15067% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6531482
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.15no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)no data
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eC67
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 February 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843
Core clock speed300 MHz1 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate55.20no data
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing Busno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4shared Memory
Maximum RAM amount32 GBno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)shared Memory
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 4.55
+15067%
GeForce 7000M 0.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1757
+13415%
GeForce 7000M 13

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Battlefield 5 10−12 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 0−1
Hitman 3 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+60.7%
27−30
−60.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Battlefield 5 10−12 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 0−1
Hitman 3 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+60.7%
27−30
−60.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 0−1
Hitman 3 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+60.7%
27−30
−60.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics 650 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Iris Plus Graphics 650 surpassed GeForce 7000M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.55 0.03
Recency 3 January 2017 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

Iris Plus Graphics 650 has a 15066.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Plus Graphics 650
NVIDIA GeForce 7000M
GeForce 7000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 98 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 23 votes

Rate GeForce 7000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.