GeForce GTX 1660 vs HD Graphics P630

Place in performance ranking	716	171
Place by popularity	not in top-100	43
Value for money	0.02	25.03
Architecture	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2	Turing TU116
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	5 August 2016 (7 years ago)	14 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$219
Current price	$1449	$252 (1.2x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 has 125050% better value for money than HD Graphics P630.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	24	1408
Core clock speed	no data	1530 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.40	157.1

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1740 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.1 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.103	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics P630 3.09

GTX 1660 30.19
+877%

GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by 877% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics P630 1198

GTX 1660 11691
+876%

GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by 876% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8−9 −975%	86 +975%
1440p	4−5 −1100%	48 +1100%
4K	2−3 −1300%	28 +1300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

−1083%

71
+1083%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1040%	55−60 +1040%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	59
Battlefield 5	7−8 −1243%	90−95 +1243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −762%	112 +762%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −867%	58 +867%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1900%	100 +1900%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1800%	95 +1800%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1550%	132 +1550%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1733%	110 +1733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1540%	82 +1540%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1117%	73 +1117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −830%	93 +830%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −3800%	78 +3800%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1040%	55−60 +1040%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	42
Battlefield 5	7−8 −1243%	90−95 +1243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −554%	85 +554%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −683%	47 +683%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1740%	92 +1740%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1680%	89 +1680%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1438%	123 +1438%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1400%	90 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1120%	61 +1120%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1325%	57 +1325%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −567%	40 +567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −680%	78 +680%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −1357%	102 +1357%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −3200%	66 +3200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1040%	55−60 +1040%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	37
Battlefield 5	7−8 −1243%	90−95 +1243%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −567%	40 +567%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1620%	86 +1620%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1540%	82 +1540%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1125%	98 +1125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −714%	57 +714%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −1350%	29 +1350%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −1040%	57 +1040%
Hitman 3	6−7 −850%	57 +850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −300%	40 +300%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −3200%	33 +3200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −2400%	25 +2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −700%	48 +700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −3200%	30−35 +3200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1100%	24 +1100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1080%	59 +1080%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −3700%	76 +3700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −1200%	35−40 +1200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1500%	32 +1500%
Hitman 3	3−4 −933%	31 +933%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −57.1%	11 +57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1400%	15 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	10
Far Cry 5	4−5 −650%	30 +650%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −417%	31 +417%

This is how HD Graphics P630 and GTX 1660 compete in popular games:

GTX 1660 is 975% faster than HD Graphics P630 in 1080p
GTX 1660 is 1100% faster than HD Graphics P630 in 1440p
GTX 1660 is 1300% faster than HD Graphics P630 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1660 is 3800% faster than the HD Graphics P630.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 1660 surpassed HD Graphics P630 in all 54 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	3.09	30.19
Recency	5 August 2016	14 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1740 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	120 Watt