T1000 vs HD Graphics (Broadwell)
Aggregate performance score
T1000 outperforms HD Graphics (Broadwell) by a whopping 1968% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1080 | 264 |
| Place by popularity | 2 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | 39.19 |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell (2014−2015) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | Broadwell GT1 | TU117 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 (9 years ago) | 6 May 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | $437 | $119 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
T1000 has 195850% better value for money than HD Graphics (Broadwell).
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 12 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 100 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 78.12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on HD Graphics (Broadwell) and T1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 10 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.2 |
| CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1900%
|
60−65
+1900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−1900%
|
40−45
+1900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1900%
|
60−65
+1900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1900%
|
100−105
+1900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−1900%
|
80−85
+1900%
|
| Hitman 3 | 3−4
−1900%
|
60−65
+1900%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−1900%
|
240−250
+1900%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−1900%
|
180−190
+1900%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−1900%
|
40−45
+1900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1900%
|
60−65
+1900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1900%
|
100−105
+1900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−1900%
|
80−85
+1900%
|
| Hitman 3 | 3−4
−1900%
|
60−65
+1900%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−1900%
|
240−250
+1900%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−1900%
|
180−190
+1900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−1900%
|
60−65
+1900%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−1900%
|
40−45
+1900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1900%
|
60−65
+1900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1900%
|
100−105
+1900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−1900%
|
80−85
+1900%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−1900%
|
240−250
+1900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−1900%
|
60−65
+1900%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−1900%
|
80−85
+1900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−1900%
|
80−85
+1900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
4K
High Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1900%
|
100−105
+1900%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−1900%
|
80−85
+1900%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−1900%
|
40−45
+1900%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.96 | 19.85 |
| Recency | 5 January 2015 | 6 May 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
The T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Broadwell) in performance tests.
Be aware that HD Graphics (Broadwell) is a notebook card while T1000 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
