Radeon 740M vs HD Graphics 2500
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics 2500 with Radeon 740M, including specs and performance data.
740M outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 1106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1170 | 502 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 38.34 |
Architecture | Generation 7.0 (2012−2013) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024) |
GPU code name | Ivy Bridge GT1 | Phoenix |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 April 2012 (12 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 800 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Number of transistors | 392 million | 25,390 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | unknown | 15 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 6.900 | 40.00 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.1104 TFLOPS | 2.56 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 1 | 8 |
TMUs | 6 | 16 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Width | IGP | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.7 |
OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 8
−150%
| 20
+150%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−500%
|
18−20
+500%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−2400%
|
24−27
+2400%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−240%
|
16−18
+240%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−355%
|
50−55
+355%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 24−27 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−383%
|
27−30
+383%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−96.7%
|
55−60
+96.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−500%
|
18−20
+500%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−2400%
|
24−27
+2400%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−240%
|
16−18
+240%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−355%
|
50−55
+355%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 24−27 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−383%
|
27−30
+383%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−150%
|
24−27
+150%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−96.7%
|
55−60
+96.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−500%
|
18−20
+500%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−240%
|
16−18
+240%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−355%
|
50−55
+355%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−383%
|
27−30
+383%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−150%
|
24−27
+150%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−96.7%
|
55−60
+96.7%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 24−27 |
1440p
High Preset
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−1200%
|
12−14
+1200%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 8−9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
Hitman 3 | 6−7
−100%
|
12−14
+100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4
−500%
|
18−20
+500%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−2700%
|
55−60
+2700%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−400%
|
14−16
+400%
|
4K
High Preset
Far Cry New Dawn | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
This is how HD Graphics 2500 and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:
- Radeon 740M is 150% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 740M is 2700% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Radeon 740M is ahead in 35 tests (53%)
- there's a draw in 31 test (47%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.69 | 8.32 |
Recency | 1 April 2012 | 4 January 2023 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
Radeon 740M has a 1105.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.
Be aware that HD Graphics 2500 is a desktop card while Radeon 740M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.