Radeon 740M vs HD Graphics 2500

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2500 with Radeon 740M, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 2500
2012
0.69

740M outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 1106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1170502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data38.34
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48256
Core clock speed650 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors392 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown15 Watt
Texture fill rate6.90040.00
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs616
Ray Tracing Coresno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.801.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−150%
20
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 24−27
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−96.7%
55−60
+96.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 24−27
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−96.7%
55−60
+96.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Hitman 3 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−96.7%
55−60
+96.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 24−27

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 8−9
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Hitman 3 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−2700%
55−60
+2700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 6−7

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 4−5

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 2500 and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is 150% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 740M is 2700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is ahead in 35 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 31 test (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 8.32
Recency 1 April 2012 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm

Radeon 740M has a 1105.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2500 is a desktop card while Radeon 740M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1354 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 68 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.