GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 5050 Mobile outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 354% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 480 | 96 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 64.70 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG (2023) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | GB207 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 24 June 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 2235 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1950 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 201.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 12.9 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 32 |
| TMUs | no data | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 12.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 25
−340%
| 110−120
+340%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
−1708%
|
230−240
+1708%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−236%
|
140−150
+236%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 11
−2036%
|
230−240
+2036%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−345%
|
130−140
+345%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50
−232%
|
160−170
+232%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
−362%
|
130−140
+362%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−382%
|
160−170
+382%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−165%
|
240−250
+165%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−236%
|
140−150
+236%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
−1708%
|
230−240
+1708%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
−437%
|
100−110
+437%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24
−475%
|
130−140
+475%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−219%
|
180−190
+219%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 39
−326%
|
160−170
+326%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
−362%
|
130−140
+362%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 15
−813%
|
130−140
+813%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
−453%
|
100−110
+453%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−382%
|
160−170
+382%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−536%
|
150−160
+536%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−165%
|
240−250
+165%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−236%
|
140−150
+236%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
−351%
|
230−240
+351%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
−437%
|
100−110
+437%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−345%
|
130−140
+345%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−348%
|
260−270
+348%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30
−453%
|
160−170
+453%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
−348%
|
130−140
+348%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−382%
|
160−170
+382%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−335%
|
400−450
+335%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
−314%
|
300−350
+314%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−338%
|
35−40
+338%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
−585%
|
85−90
+585%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
−491%
|
65−70
+491%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
−349%
|
220−230
+349%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 10−11
−350%
|
45−50
+350%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−350%
|
100−110
+350%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−341%
|
75−80
+341%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−430%
|
100−110
+430%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−452%
|
120−130
+452%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11
−350%
|
45−50
+350%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−562%
|
85−90
+562%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
−325%
|
450−500
+325%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−1633%
|
50−55
+1633%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−357%
|
95−100
+357%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−700%
|
40−45
+700%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 6−7
−350%
|
27−30
+350%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−610%
|
70−75
+610%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−483%
|
70−75
+483%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−556%
|
55−60
+556%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
−344%
|
40−45
+344%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−431%
|
85−90
+431%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
−329%
|
30−33
+329%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−600%
|
60−65
+600%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
−340%
|
220−230
+340%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Sons of the Forest | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Valorant | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Valorant | 260−270
+0%
|
260−270
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
This is how Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and RTX 5050 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 5050 Mobile is 340% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 5050 Mobile is 2036% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 5050 Mobile is ahead in 43 tests (73%)
- there's a draw in 16 tests (27%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.28 | 42.14 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 24 June 2025 |
RTX 5050 Mobile has a 354.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.
The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
