Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Place in the ranking	9	57
Place by popularity	12	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	67.28	86.87
Power efficiency	24.35	13.89
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	AD104	Navi 22
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)	17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	$334

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 29% better value for money than RTX 4070 SUPER.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7168	2560
Core clock speed	1980 MHz	2321 MHz
Boost clock speed	2475 MHz	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	35,800 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	220 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	554.4	413.0
Floating-point processing power	35.48 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs	80	64
TMUs	224	160
Tensor Cores	224	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	56	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	504.2 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 SUPER 78.08
+54.2%

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 50.62

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4070 SUPER 30074
+54.2%

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 19499

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	221 +57.9%	140−150 −57.9%
1440p	139 +54.4%	90−95 −54.4%
4K	86 +56.4%	55−60 −56.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.71	2.39
1440p	4.31	3.71
4K	6.97	6.07

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +59%	100−105 −59%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +57.8%	90−95 −57.8%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +62.7%	150−160 −62.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +60%	75−80 −60%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +57.3%	75−80 −57.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	190−200 +61.7%	120−130 −61.7%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +55%	160−170 −55%
Hitman 3	120−130 +61.3%	80−85 −61.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	270−280 +54.4%	180−190 −54.4%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +55%	100−105 −55%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +55%	80−85 −55%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−350 +60.5%	210−220 −60.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +62.1%	95−100 −62.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +59%	100−105 −59%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +57.8%	90−95 −57.8%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +62.7%	150−160 −62.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +60%	75−80 −60%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +57.3%	75−80 −57.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	190−200 +61.7%	120−130 −61.7%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +55%	160−170 −55%
Hitman 3	120−130 +61.3%	80−85 −61.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	270−280 +54.4%	180−190 −54.4%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +55%	100−105 −55%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +55%	80−85 −55%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	428 +58.5%	270−280 −58.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +55.5%	110−120 −55.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +62.1%	95−100 −62.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +59%	100−105 −59%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +57.8%	90−95 −57.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +60%	75−80 −60%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +57.3%	75−80 −57.3%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +55%	160−170 −55%
Hitman 3	120−130 +61.3%	80−85 −61.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	270−280 +54.4%	180−190 −54.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	381 +58.8%	240−250 −58.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	201 +54.6%	130−140 −54.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	139 +54.4%	90−95 −54.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+55%

80−85
−55%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +66%	100−105 −66%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +60%	70−75 −60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +55%	60−65 −55%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +56.9%	65−70 −56.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +64%	50−55 −64%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +68%	50−55 −68%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +59.4%	170−180 −59.4%
Hitman 3	110−120 +62.9%	70−75 −62.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 +58.5%	130−140 −58.5%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +55%	80−85 −55%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	265 +55.9%	170−180 −55.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	154 +62.1%	95−100 −62.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	240−250 +60%	150−160 −60%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+64%

75−80
−64%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +60%	55−60 −60%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +72.5%	40−45 −72.5%
Hitman 3	70−75 +55.6%	45−50 −55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +61.4%	140−150 −61.4%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +62.5%	80−85 −62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	133 +56.5%	85−90 −56.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +67.5%	40−45 −67.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +60%	40−45 −60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +73.3%	30−33 −73.3%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +66.7%	30−33 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +55.8%	95−100 −55.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	132 +55.3%	85−90 −55.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	62 +55%	40−45 −55%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95
+63.6%

55−60

−63.6%

This is how RTX 4070 SUPER and RX 6750 GRE 12 GB compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 SUPER is 58% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 54% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 SUPER is 56% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	78.08	50.62
Recency	8 January 2024	17 October 2023
Chip lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	220 Watt	250 Watt

RTX 4070 SUPER has a 54.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 13.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.