Arc B580 vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) with Arc B580, including specs and performance data.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2023
9.93

Arc B580 outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 293% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking447107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data93.02
Power efficiencyno data14.63
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Xe2 (2025)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUBMG-G21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores42560
Core clock speedno data2670 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz2670 MHz
Number of transistorsno data19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data190 Watt
Texture fill rateno data427.2
Floating-point processing powerno data13.67 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data456.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−400%
125
+400%
1440p16−18
−338%
70
+338%
4K10−12
−320%
42
+320%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.99
1440pno data3.56
4Kno data5.93

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
−1000%
143
+1000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−221%
100−110
+221%
Counter-Strike 2 11
−964%
117
+964%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−290%
160−170
+290%
Forza Horizon 4 50
−280%
190−200
+280%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−296%
100−110
+296%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−280%
300−310
+280%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−189%
75−80
+189%
Valorant 40−45
−303%
160−170
+303%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−221%
100−110
+221%
Counter-Strike 2 13
−700%
104
+700%
Dota 2 15
−833%
140
+833%
Far Cry 5 24
−188%
69
+188%
Fortnite 60−65
−190%
170−180
+190%
Forza Horizon 4 39
−285%
150−160
+285%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−296%
100−110
+296%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−267%
55−60
+267%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−28.6%
36
+28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−156%
200−210
+156%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−189%
75−80
+189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−365%
140−150
+365%
Valorant 40−45
−303%
160−170
+303%
World of Tanks 140−150
−89.8%
270−280
+89.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−221%
100−110
+221%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−428%
95
+428%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−141%
95−100
+141%
Fortnite 60−65
−283%
230−240
+283%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−267%
110−120
+267%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−296%
100−110
+296%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−156%
200−210
+156%
Valorant 40−45
−303%
160−170
+303%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
−431%
69
+431%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−283%
180−190
+283%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
World of Tanks 70−75
−251%
250−260
+251%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−270%
70−75
+270%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−291%
90−95
+291%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−319%
65−70
+319%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Valorant 24−27
−412%
120−130
+412%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Dota 2 21−24
−271%
78
+271%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−820%
46
+820%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−422%
45−50
+422%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−367%
14
+367%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Fortnite 10−12
−427%
55−60
+427%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−443%
35−40
+443%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Valorant 10−11
−580%
65−70
+580%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

This is how Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is 400% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B580 is 338% faster in 1440p
  • Arc B580 is 320% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc B580 is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is ahead in 41 test (91%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.93 39.05
Recency 14 December 2023 16 January 2025

Arc B580 has a 293.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Intel Arc B580
Arc B580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 457 votes

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.