GeForce GTX 1630 vs RTX 4060

Place in the ranking	51	390
Place by popularity	2	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	100.00	no data
Power efficiency	30.69	11.82
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	AD107	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)	28 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$299	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	512
Core clock speed	1830 MHz	1740 MHz
Boost clock speed	2460 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	18,900 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	236.2	57.12
Floating-point processing power	15.11 TFLOPS	1.828 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	96	32
Tensor Cores	96	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	24	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	240 mm	145 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2125 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	272.0 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.8	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 51.51
+298%

GTX 1630 12.94

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4060 19852
+298%

GTX 1630 4985

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	145 +314%	35−40 −314%
1440p	77 +328%	18−20 −328%
4K	44 +340%	10−12 −340%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.06	no data
1440p	3.88	no data
4K	6.80	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

139

+363%

30−33
−363%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−110 +342%	24−27 −342%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +319%	21−24 −319%
Battlefield 5	160−170 +305%	40−45 −305%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 +313%	24−27 −313%
Cyberpunk 2077	107 +346%	24−27 −346%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +325%	24−27 −325%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +310%	30−33 −310%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +328%	50−55 −328%
Hitman 3	100−110 +300%	27−30 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 +342%	45−50 −342%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +320%	35−40 −320%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 +346%	24−27 −346%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	190−200 +338%	45−50 −338%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +306%	35−40 −306%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−110 +342%	24−27 −342%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +319%	21−24 −319%
Battlefield 5	160−170 +305%	40−45 −305%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 +313%	24−27 −313%
Cyberpunk 2077	90 +329%	21−24 −329%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +325%	24−27 −325%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +310%	30−33 −310%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +328%	50−55 −328%
Hitman 3	100−110 +300%	27−30 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 +342%	45−50 −342%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +320%	35−40 −320%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−110 +346%	24−27 −346%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	217 +334%	50−55 −334%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +338%	24−27 −338%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +306%	35−40 −306%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−110 +342%	24−27 −342%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +319%	21−24 −319%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 +313%	24−27 −313%
Cyberpunk 2077	80 +344%	18−20 −344%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +325%	24−27 −325%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +328%	50−55 −328%
Hitman 3	100−110 +300%	27−30 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	190−200 +342%	45−50 −342%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	190 +322%	45−50 −322%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	112 +315%	27−30 −315%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +306%	35−40 −306%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

100−110

+346%

24−27
−346%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +333%	24−27 −333%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +333%	18−20 −333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +307%	14−16 −307%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +329%	14−16 −329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +329%	14−16 −329%
Cyberpunk 2077	48 +300%	12−14 −300%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +321%	14−16 −321%
Forza Horizon 4	260−270 +300%	65−70 −300%
Hitman 3	70−75 +338%	16−18 −338%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +333%	27−30 −333%
Metro Exodus	111 +311%	27−30 −311%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	129 +330%	30−33 −330%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +350%	18−20 −350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	210−220 +298%	55−60 −298%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90
+319%

21−24

−319%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +350%	12−14 −350%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +360%	10−11 −360%
Hitman 3	40−45 +320%	10−11 −320%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 +316%	50−55 −316%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +338%	16−18 −338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	68 +325%	16−18 −325%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +311%	9−10 −311%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +338%	8−9 −338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +338%	8−9 −338%
Cyberpunk 2077	20 +300%	5−6 −300%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +300%	8−9 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +311%	18−20 −311%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70 +338%	16−18 −338%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +300%	7−8 −300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
+300%

12−14

−300%

This is how RTX 4060 and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 is 314% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 is 328% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 is 340% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	51.51	12.94
Recency	18 May 2023	28 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	75 Watt

RTX 4060 has a 298.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1630, on the other hand, has 53.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1630 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.