GeForce GTX 1630 vs RTX 4080

Place in performance ranking	3	363
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	17.30	12.85
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	AD103-300-A1	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	20 September 2022 (1 year ago)	28 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	no data
Current price	$1451 (1.2x MSRP)	$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4080 has 35% better value for money than GTX 1630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	9728	512
Core clock speed	2205 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2505 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	45,900 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	320 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	761.5	57.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	310 mm	145 mm
Width	3-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	22400 MHz	12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	716.8 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4080 89.61
+593%

GTX 1630 12.93

RTX 4080 outperforms GTX 1630 by 593% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4080 34611
+593%

GTX 1630 4993

RTX 4080 outperforms GTX 1630 by 593% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	243 +594%	35−40 −594%
1440p	174 +625%	24−27 −625%
4K	112 +600%	16−18 −600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

1600−1650

+593%

231
−593%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1000−1050 +590%	140−150 −590%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1800−1850 +587%	262 −587%
Battlefield 5	1650−1700 +576%	240−250 −576%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	800−850 +567%	120−130 −567%
Cyberpunk 2077	1600−1650 +593%	231 −593%
Far Cry 5	800−850 +578%	110−120 −578%
Far Cry New Dawn	1350−1400 +572%	200−210 −572%
Forza Horizon 4	1900−1950 +591%	270−280 −591%
Hitman 3	850−900 +591%	120−130 −591%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3300−3350 +590%	478 −590%
Metro Exodus	1050−1100 +591%	150−160 −591%
Red Dead Redemption 2	850−900 +585%	120−130 −585%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3650−3700 +593%	527 −593%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1300−1350 +581%	191 −581%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1000−1050 +590%	140−150 −590%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1500−1550 +591%	217 −591%
Battlefield 5	1650−1700 +576%	240−250 −576%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	800−850 +567%	120−130 −567%
Cyberpunk 2077	1450−1500 +590%	210 −590%
Far Cry 5	800−850 +578%	110−120 −578%
Far Cry New Dawn	1350−1400 +572%	200−210 −572%
Forza Horizon 4	1900−1950 +591%	270−280 −591%
Hitman 3	850−900 +591%	120−130 −591%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2600−2650 +590%	350−400 −590%
Metro Exodus	550−600 +563%	83 −563%
Red Dead Redemption 2	850−900 +585%	120−130 −585%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3500−3550 +584%	512 −584%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3750−3800 +588%	545 −588%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1000−1050 +562%	150−160 −562%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1000−1050 +590%	140−150 −590%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1300−1350 +588%	189 −588%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	800−850 +567%	120−130 −567%
Cyberpunk 2077	1300−1350 +584%	190 −584%
Far Cry 5	800−850 +578%	110−120 −578%
Forza Horizon 4	1900−1950 +591%	270−280 −591%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2700−2750 +582%	396 −582%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3300−3350 +588%	480 −588%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1750−1800 +576%	259 −576%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1100−1150 +571%	164 −571%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

850−900
+585%

120−130

−585%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1150−1200 +593%	160−170 −593%
Far Cry New Dawn	950−1000 +560%	140−150 −560%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	750−800 +582%	110−120 −582%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1050−1100 +586%	153 −586%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	750−800 +570%	110−120 −570%
Cyberpunk 2077	850−900 +559%	129 −559%
Far Cry 5	1350−1400 +572%	201 −572%
Forza Horizon 4	1650−1700 +582%	240−250 −582%
Hitman 3	900−950 +587%	130−140 −587%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2300−2350 +593%	332 −593%
Metro Exodus	1000−1050 +571%	149 −571%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2700−2750 +592%	390 −592%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1300−1350 +581%	191 −581%
Watch Dogs: Legion	950−1000 +569%	142 −569%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

850−900
+559%

120−130

−559%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	600−650 +582%	85−90 −582%
Far Cry New Dawn	450−500 +552%	65−70 −552%
Hitman 3	550−600 +563%	80−85 −563%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1050−1100 +577%	150−160 −577%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	900−950 +577%	133 −577%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1250−1300 +568%	187 −568%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	550−600 +571%	80−85 −571%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	650−700 +550%	100 −550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	350−400 +573%	50−55 −573%
Cyberpunk 2077	400−450 +535%	63 −535%
Far Cry 5	300−310 +500%	50−55 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	1350−1400 +578%	190−200 −578%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1350−1400 +572%	201 −572%
Metro Exodus	900−950 +592%	130 −592%
Watch Dogs: Legion	600−650 +590%	87 −590%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

750−800
+576%

110−120

−576%

This is how RTX 4080 and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 is 594% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 is 625% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 is 600% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	89.61	12.93
Recency	20 September 2022	28 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	320 Watt	75 Watt