Quadro P4000 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G
Aggregated performance score
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G outperforms Quadro P4000 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 43 | 174 |
| Place by popularity | 79 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 38.83 | 25.19 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | AD106 | GP104 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2023 (less than a year ago) | 6 February 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $815 |
| Current price | $424 | $485 (0.6x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
RTX 4060 Ti 8G has 54% better value for money than Quadro P4000.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4352 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1202 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2535 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 165.8 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 5,304 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 241 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 18000 MHz | 7604 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 192 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | no data | 1.4 |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | no data | + |
| 3D Stereo | no data | + |
| Mosaic | no data | + |
| nView Display Management | no data | + |
| Optimus | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | no data | + |
| CUDA | no data | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 173
+154%
| 68
−154%
|
| 1440p | 90
+80%
| 50−55
−80%
|
| 4K | 53
+76.7%
| 30−35
−76.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 175
+243%
|
50−55
−243%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 85−90
+50.9%
|
55−60
−50.9%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 90−95
+71.7%
|
50−55
−71.7%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+44.7%
|
90−95
−44.7%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 140−150
+76.5%
|
80−85
−76.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 137
+169%
|
50−55
−169%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 201
+158%
|
75−80
−158%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 173
+125%
|
75−80
−125%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+55.7%
|
95−100
−55.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 160−170
+80.6%
|
90−95
−80.6%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 110−120
+75.4%
|
65−70
−75.4%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85−90
+73.5%
|
45−50
−73.5%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 222
+222%
|
65−70
−222%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 90−95
+63.2%
|
55−60
−63.2%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 85−90
+50.9%
|
55−60
−50.9%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 90−95
+71.7%
|
50−55
−71.7%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+44.7%
|
90−95
−44.7%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 140−150
+76.5%
|
80−85
−76.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 113
+122%
|
50−55
−122%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 193
+147%
|
75−80
−147%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 166
+116%
|
75−80
−116%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+55.7%
|
95−100
−55.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 160−170
+80.6%
|
90−95
−80.6%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 110−120
+75.4%
|
65−70
−75.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 134
+158%
|
50−55
−158%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85−90
+73.5%
|
45−50
−73.5%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 193
+180%
|
65−70
−180%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 277
+260%
|
77
−260%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 90−95
+63.2%
|
55−60
−63.2%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 85−90
+50.9%
|
55−60
−50.9%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 90−95
+71.7%
|
50−55
−71.7%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+44.7%
|
90−95
−44.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 101
+98%
|
50−55
−98%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 180
+131%
|
75−80
−131%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 147
+90.9%
|
75−80
−90.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+55.7%
|
95−100
−55.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 141
+244%
|
41
−244%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 90−95
+63.2%
|
55−60
−63.2%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 90−95
+91.7%
|
45−50
−91.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 100−110
+102%
|
50−55
−102%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 80−85
+100%
|
40−45
−100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 79
+155%
|
30−35
−155%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
+95.7%
|
21−24
−95.7%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 121
+188%
|
40−45
−188%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55−60
+75.8%
|
30−35
−75.8%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 60−65
+100%
|
30−35
−100%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+56.1%
|
65−70
−56.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 60
+186%
|
21−24
−186%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 134
+153%
|
50−55
−153%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 127
+119%
|
55−60
−119%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+85.5%
|
60−65
−85.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 101
+166%
|
35−40
−166%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 50−55
+108%
|
24−27
−108%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 50−55
+112%
|
24−27
−112%
|
| Hitman 3 | 55−60
+100%
|
27−30
−100%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 45−50
+129%
|
21−24
−129%
|
| Metro Exodus | 49
+158%
|
18−20
−158%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+81.3%
|
16−18
−81.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 59
+168%
|
21−24
−168%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 79
+132%
|
30−35
−132%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
+90%
|
20−22
−90%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 35−40
+118%
|
16−18
−118%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+80.6%
|
35−40
−80.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 25
+213%
|
8−9
−213%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 67
+148%
|
27−30
−148%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 70
+133%
|
30−33
−133%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+83.3%
|
40−45
−83.3%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
+107%
|
14−16
−107%
|
This is how RTX 4060 Ti 8G and Quadro P4000 compete in popular games:
- RTX 4060 Ti 8G is 154% faster in 1080p
- RTX 4060 Ti 8G is 80% faster in 1440p
- RTX 4060 Ti 8G is 77% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4060 Ti 8G is 260% faster than the Quadro P4000.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RTX 4060 Ti 8G surpassed Quadro P4000 in all 68 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 52.67 | 30.11 |
| Recency | 18 May 2023 | 6 February 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4000 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G is a desktop card while Quadro P4000 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
