Radeon RX 6750 XT vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G

Place in performance ranking	43	38
Place by popularity	79	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	38.71	29.42
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	AD106	Navi 22
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 May 2023 (less than a year ago)	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$549
Current price	$424	$559 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4060 Ti 8G has 32% better value for money than RX 6750 XT.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4352	2560
Core clock speed	2310 MHz	2150 MHz
Boost clock speed	2535 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	416.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_2	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	no data	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 Ti 8G 52.71

RX 6750 XT 53.62
+1.7%

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4060 Ti 8G 118567
+14%

RX 6750 XT 104004

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G outperforms Radeon RX 6750 XT by 14% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4060 Ti 8G 47803

RX 6750 XT 48327
+1.1%

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 1% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4060 Ti 8G 34245

RX 6750 XT 37609
+9.8%

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G by 10% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4060 Ti 8G 176605
+3.3%

RX 6750 XT 170993

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G outperforms Radeon RX 6750 XT by 3% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RTX 4060 Ti 8G 795061
+50.1%

RX 6750 XT 529598

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G outperforms Radeon RX 6750 XT by 50% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	173 +4.2%	166 −4.2%
1440p	90 −3.3%	93 +3.3%
4K	53 +0%	53 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

175
+6.1%

165

−6.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −2.2%	90−95 +2.2%
Battlefield 5	130−140 −1.5%	130−140 +1.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 −1.4%	140−150 +1.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	137 +7.9%	127 −7.9%
Far Cry 5	201 +12.9%	178 −12.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	173 +15.3%	150 −15.3%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 −2%	150−160 +2%
Hitman 3	160−170 −1.8%	170−180 +1.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −2.6%	110−120 +2.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	222 +5.2%	211 −5.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −45.2%	135 +45.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −2.2%	90−95 +2.2%
Battlefield 5	130−140 −1.5%	130−140 +1.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 −1.4%	140−150 +1.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	113 +3.7%	109 −3.7%
Far Cry 5	193 +13.5%	170 −13.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	166 +14.5%	145 −14.5%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 −2%	150−160 +2%
Hitman 3	160−170 −1.8%	170−180 +1.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −2.6%	110−120 +2.6%
Metro Exodus	134 +5.5%	127 −5.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	193 +4.3%	185 −4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	277 +13.1%	245 −13.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −34.4%	125 +34.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −2.2%	90−95 +2.2%
Battlefield 5	130−140 −1.5%	130−140 +1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	101 +3.1%	98 −3.1%
Far Cry 5	180 +13.9%	158 −13.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	147 +13.1%	130 −13.1%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 −2%	150−160 +2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	141 +4.4%	135 −4.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −5.4%	98 +5.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 −2.2%	90−95 +2.2%
Hitman 3	100−110 −2.8%	110−120 +2.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −2.5%	80−85 +2.5%
Metro Exodus	79 +3.9%	76 −3.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −2.2%	45−50 +2.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	121 +2.5%	118 −2.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −1.7%	55−60 +1.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −1.6%	60−65 +1.6%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −1.9%	100−110 +1.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	60 +0%	60 +0%
Far Cry 5	134 −5.2%	141 +5.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	127 +0.8%	126 −0.8%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −2.6%	110−120 +2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	101 +13.5%	85−90 −13.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −40.4%	73 +40.4%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −3.8%	55−60 +3.8%
Hitman 3	55−60 −3.4%	60−65 +3.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −4.2%	50−55 +4.2%
Metro Exodus	49 +4.3%	47 −4.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	59 −1.7%	60 +1.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	79 +0%	79 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −2.7%	35−40 +2.7%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −1.5%	65−70 +1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 −4%	26 +4%
Far Cry 5	67 −16.4%	78 +16.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	70 −17.1%	82 +17.1%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −2.6%	75−80 +2.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −41.4%	41 +41.4%

This is how RTX 4060 Ti 8G and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti 8G is 4.2% faster than RX 6750 XT in 1080p
RX 6750 XT is 3.3% faster than RTX 4060 Ti 8G in 1440p
RX 6750 XT is 0% faster than RTX 4060 Ti 8G in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 4060 Ti 8G is 15.3% faster than the RX 6750 XT.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 45.2% faster than the RTX 4060 Ti 8G.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti 8G is ahead in 20 tests (29%)
RX 6750 XT is ahead in 46 tests (68%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	52.71	53.62
Recency	18 May 2023	3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	250 Watt