Radeon HD 4350 vs GeForce RTX 3090

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking19not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money16.39no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Terascale 1 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameAmpere GA102RV710
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 September 2020 (3 years ago)30 September 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data
Current price$1198 (0.8x MSRP)$81

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1049680
Core clock speed1400 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate556.04.800
Floating-point performanceno data96 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length313 mmno data
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XDDR2
Maximum RAM amount24 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed19500 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth936.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DisplayPort
HDMI+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3090 26816
+20528%
ATI HD 4350 130

GeForce RTX 3090 outperforms Radeon HD 4350 by 20528% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3090 121431
+17550%
ATI HD 4350 688

GeForce RTX 3090 outperforms Radeon HD 4350 by 17550% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 24 September 2020 30 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 20 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3090 and Radeon HD 4350. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
ATI Radeon HD 4350
Radeon HD 4350

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 78396 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 214 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.