Arc 8-Cores iGPU vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with Arc 8-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3060 Ti
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 220 Watt
53.18
+193%

RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by a whopping 193% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking43284
Place by popularity18not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.61no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Xe LPG
GPU code nameAmpere GA104Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 December 2020 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data
Current price$361 (0.9x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48648
Core clock speed1410 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1665 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Wattno data
Texture fill rate253.1no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed14000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2no data
CUDA8.6no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 Ti 53.18
+193%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 18.14

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 193% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3060 Ti 35683
+191%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 12276

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 191% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3060 Ti 78597
+82%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 43185

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 82% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3060 Ti 26883
+210%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 8679

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 210% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3060 Ti 138278
+226%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 42473

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 226% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD138
+245%
40
−245%
1440p81
+406%
16
−406%
4K51
+219%
16−18
−219%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 83
+207%
27−30
−207%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 121 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95 no data
Battlefield 5 160−170 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+200%
27−30
−200%
Far Cry 5 100−110 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130 no data
Forza Horizon 4 200 no data
Hitman 3 100−110 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 152 no data
Metro Exodus 130−140
+228%
40−45
−228%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 122 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81 no data
Battlefield 5 160−170 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+225%
24−27
−225%
Far Cry 5 100−110 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130 no data
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 no data
Hitman 3 51 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230 no data
Metro Exodus 55 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 192 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 185 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+194%
35−40
−194%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+221%
24−27
−221%
Far Cry 5 100−110 no data
Forza Horizon 4 173 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 140
+211%
45−50
−211%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 174
+216%
55−60
−216%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 77 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+223%
35−40
−223%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+214%
35−40
−214%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+210%
40−45
−210%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+211%
27−30
−211%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+225%
16−18
−225%
Far Cry 5 105 no data
Forza Horizon 4 150 no data
Hitman 3 70−75
+208%
24−27
−208%
Horizon Zero Dawn 114
+226%
35−40
−226%
Metro Exodus 93
+210%
30−33
−210%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 139
+209%
45−50
−209%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 59 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+203%
30−33
−203%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+222%
18−20
−222%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+206%
16−18
−206%
Hitman 3 57 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+208%
12−14
−208%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+213%
8−9
−213%
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 103 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 71
+196%
24−27
−196%
Metro Exodus 63
+200%
21−24
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+219%
16−18
−219%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+228%
18−20
−228%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+206%
16−18
−206%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Hitman 3 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+208%
12−14
−208%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+200%
12−14
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

This is how RTX 3060 Ti and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti is 245% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 406% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 219% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.18 18.14
Recency 1 December 2020 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Cores iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop card while Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 14085 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 30 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.