Radeon PRO W7800 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Place in the ranking	208	13
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	30.38
Power efficiency	31.29	20.93
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GN20-P0-R 6 GB	Navi 31
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	6 January 2023 (1 year ago)	13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	4480
Core clock speed	1237 MHz	1855 MHz
Boost clock speed	1492 MHz	2499 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	699.7
Floating-point processing power	no data	44.78 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	128
TMUs	no data	280
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	280 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	96 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_2	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.2
Vulkan	-	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	69 −190%	200−210 +190%
1440p	35 −186%	100−110 +186%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

81
−184%

230−240

+184%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −173%	150−160 +173%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −179%	120−130 +179%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −180%	230−240 +180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −175%	140−150 +175%
Cyberpunk 2077	64 −181%	180−190 +181%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −176%	160−170 +176%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −177%	180−190 +177%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −174%	400−450 +174%
Hitman 3	50−55 −175%	140−150 +175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −161%	300−310 +161%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −179%	240−250 +179%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −177%	180−190 +177%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −182%	240−250 +182%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −182%	290−300 +182%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −173%	150−160 +173%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −179%	120−130 +179%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −180%	230−240 +180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −175%	140−150 +175%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 −183%	130−140 +183%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −176%	160−170 +176%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −177%	180−190 +177%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −174%	400−450 +174%
Hitman 3	50−55 −175%	140−150 +175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −161%	300−310 +161%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −179%	240−250 +179%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −177%	180−190 +177%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	86 −179%	240−250 +179%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −178%	150−160 +178%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −182%	290−300 +182%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −173%	150−160 +173%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −179%	120−130 +179%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −175%	140−150 +175%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 −182%	110−120 +182%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −176%	160−170 +176%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −174%	400−450 +174%
Hitman 3	50−55 −175%	140−150 +175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −161%	300−310 +161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	76 −189%	220−230 +189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50 −180%	140−150 +180%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −182%	290−300 +182%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70
−177%

180−190

+177%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −171%	130−140 +171%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −189%	110−120 +189%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −188%	75−80 +188%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −180%	70−75 +180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −186%	80−85 +186%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −176%	80−85 +176%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −178%	400−450 +178%
Hitman 3	30−33 −183%	85−90 +183%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −188%	150−160 +188%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −171%	130−140 +171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	57 −181%	160−170 +181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 −170%	100−105 +170%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 −184%	400−450 +184%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
−186%

120−130

+186%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −180%	70−75 +180%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Hitman 3	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −171%	350−400 +171%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −186%	80−85 +186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −178%	75−80 +178%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −179%	95−100 +179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −174%	85−90 +174%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−173%

60−65
+173%

This is how RTX 3050 6GB Mobile and PRO W7800 compete in popular games:

PRO W7800 is 190% faster in 1080p
PRO W7800 is 186% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	25.58	74.16
Recency	6 January 2023	13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	260 Watt

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has 333.3% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800, on the other hand, has a 189.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.