Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce RTX 2070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 with Radeon Pro 5300M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt
36.12
+171%

RTX 2070 outperforms Pro 5300M by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking100356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.02no data
Power efficiency16.3012.39
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTU106Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date17 October 2018 (6 years ago)13 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041280
Core clock speed1410 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate233.3100.0
Floating-point processing power7.465 TFLOPS3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14480
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 2070 36.12
+171%
Pro 5300M 13.33

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2070 16140
+171%
Pro 5300M 5955

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD128
+184%
45−50
−184%
1440p87
+190%
30−35
−190%
4K62
+195%
21−24
−195%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.90no data
1440p5.74no data
4K8.05no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
+216%
35−40
−216%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+168%
80−85
−168%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+203%
30−33
−203%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
+216%
35−40
−216%
Battlefield 5 126
+100%
60−65
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+168%
80−85
−168%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+203%
30−33
−203%
Far Cry 5 114
+133%
45−50
−133%
Fortnite 174
+112%
80−85
−112%
Forza Horizon 4 142
+133%
60−65
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+163%
45−50
−163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 211
+298%
50−55
−298%
Valorant 258
+115%
120−130
−115%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
+216%
35−40
−216%
Battlefield 5 117
+85.7%
60−65
−85.7%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+168%
80−85
−168%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+42.6%
190−200
−42.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+203%
30−33
−203%
Dota 2 138
+50%
90−95
−50%
Far Cry 5 110
+124%
45−50
−124%
Fortnite 162
+97.6%
80−85
−97.6%
Forza Horizon 4 135
+121%
60−65
−121%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+163%
45−50
−163%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+131%
55−60
−131%
Metro Exodus 78
+160%
30−33
−160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 202
+281%
50−55
−281%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 158
+295%
40−45
−295%
Valorant 248
+107%
120−130
−107%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 108
+71.4%
60−65
−71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+203%
30−33
−203%
Dota 2 130
+41.3%
90−95
−41.3%
Far Cry 5 104
+112%
45−50
−112%
Forza Horizon 4 110
+80.3%
60−65
−80.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 147
+177%
50−55
−177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+118%
40−45
−118%
Valorant 184
+53.3%
120−130
−53.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 156
+90.2%
80−85
−90.2%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+261%
27−30
−261%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+148%
100−110
−148%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+243%
21−24
−243%
Metro Exodus 50
+178%
18−20
−178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+26.8%
130−140
−26.8%
Valorant 243
+63.1%
140−150
−63.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 88
+120%
40−45
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
Far Cry 5 88
+175%
30−35
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 93
+158%
35−40
−158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+208%
24−27
−208%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 109
+241%
30−35
−241%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+219%
27−30
−219%
Metro Exodus 32
+191%
10−12
−191%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+215%
20−22
−215%
Valorant 231
+189%
80−85
−189%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55
+162%
21−24
−162%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Dota 2 116
+123%
50−55
−123%
Far Cry 5 49
+227%
14−16
−227%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+152%
24−27
−152%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 61
+336%
14−16
−336%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 53
+279%
14−16
−279%

This is how RTX 2070 and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 is 184% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 is 190% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 is 195% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 is 360% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2070 surpassed Pro 5300M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.12 13.33
Recency 17 October 2018 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 85 Watt

RTX 2070 has a 171% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro 5300M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2070
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3754 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 172 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2070 or Radeon Pro 5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.